linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
To: kishon@ti.com, jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vinholikatti@gmail.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: subhashj@codeaurora.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove unnecessary function declarations
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 19:58:13 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1476800897-19898-7-git-send-email-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476800897-19898-1-git-send-email-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>

Move the functions' definitions to remove unnecessary
declarations.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
---

New patch added in v2 series.

 drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c
index 3a87e88..144b11f 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c
@@ -22,13 +22,6 @@
 #define VDDP_REF_CLK_MIN_UV        1200000
 #define VDDP_REF_CLK_MAX_UV        1200000
 
-static int __ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(struct device *, struct ufs_qcom_phy_vreg *,
-				    const char *, bool);
-static int ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(struct device *, struct ufs_qcom_phy_vreg *,
-				  const char *);
-static int ufs_qcom_phy_base_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
-				  struct ufs_qcom_phy *phy_common);
-
 int ufs_qcom_phy_calibrate(struct ufs_qcom_phy *ufs_qcom_phy,
 			   struct ufs_qcom_phy_calibration *tbl_A,
 			   int tbl_size_A,
@@ -75,45 +68,6 @@ out:
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_calibrate);
 
-struct phy *ufs_qcom_phy_generic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
-				struct ufs_qcom_phy *common_cfg,
-				const struct phy_ops *ufs_qcom_phy_gen_ops,
-				struct ufs_qcom_phy_specific_ops *phy_spec_ops)
-{
-	int err;
-	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
-	struct phy *generic_phy = NULL;
-	struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
-
-	err = ufs_qcom_phy_base_init(pdev, common_cfg);
-	if (err) {
-		dev_err(dev, "%s: phy base init failed %d\n", __func__, err);
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, of_phy_simple_xlate);
-	if (IS_ERR(phy_provider)) {
-		err = PTR_ERR(phy_provider);
-		dev_err(dev, "%s: failed to register phy %d\n", __func__, err);
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	generic_phy = devm_phy_create(dev, NULL, ufs_qcom_phy_gen_ops);
-	if (IS_ERR(generic_phy)) {
-		err =  PTR_ERR(generic_phy);
-		dev_err(dev, "%s: failed to create phy %d\n", __func__, err);
-		generic_phy = NULL;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	common_cfg->phy_spec_ops = phy_spec_ops;
-	common_cfg->dev = dev;
-
-out:
-	return generic_phy;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_generic_probe);
-
 /*
  * This assumes the embedded phy structure inside generic_phy is of type
  * struct ufs_qcom_phy. In order to function properly it's crucial
@@ -154,6 +108,45 @@ int ufs_qcom_phy_base_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+struct phy *ufs_qcom_phy_generic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
+				struct ufs_qcom_phy *common_cfg,
+				const struct phy_ops *ufs_qcom_phy_gen_ops,
+				struct ufs_qcom_phy_specific_ops *phy_spec_ops)
+{
+	int err;
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct phy *generic_phy = NULL;
+	struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
+
+	err = ufs_qcom_phy_base_init(pdev, common_cfg);
+	if (err) {
+		dev_err(dev, "%s: phy base init failed %d\n", __func__, err);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, of_phy_simple_xlate);
+	if (IS_ERR(phy_provider)) {
+		err = PTR_ERR(phy_provider);
+		dev_err(dev, "%s: failed to register phy %d\n", __func__, err);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	generic_phy = devm_phy_create(dev, NULL, ufs_qcom_phy_gen_ops);
+	if (IS_ERR(generic_phy)) {
+		err =  PTR_ERR(generic_phy);
+		dev_err(dev, "%s: failed to create phy %d\n", __func__, err);
+		generic_phy = NULL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	common_cfg->phy_spec_ops = phy_spec_ops;
+	common_cfg->dev = dev;
+
+out:
+	return generic_phy;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_generic_probe);
+
 static int __ufs_qcom_phy_clk_get(struct device *dev,
 			 const char *name, struct clk **clk_out, bool err_print)
 {
@@ -224,30 +217,6 @@ out:
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_init_clks);
 
-int
-ufs_qcom_phy_init_vregulators(struct ufs_qcom_phy *phy_common)
-{
-	int err;
-
-	err = ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vdda_pll,
-		"vdda-pll");
-	if (err)
-		goto out;
-
-	err = ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vdda_phy,
-		"vdda-phy");
-
-	if (err)
-		goto out;
-
-	/* vddp-ref-clk-* properties are optional */
-	__ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vddp_ref_clk,
-				 "vddp-ref-clk", true);
-out:
-	return err;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_init_vregulators);
-
 static int __ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(struct device *dev,
 		struct ufs_qcom_phy_vreg *vreg, const char *name, bool optional)
 {
@@ -316,6 +285,30 @@ static int ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(struct device *dev,
 	return __ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(dev, vreg, name, false);
 }
 
+int
+ufs_qcom_phy_init_vregulators(struct ufs_qcom_phy *phy_common)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	err = ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vdda_pll,
+		"vdda-pll");
+	if (err)
+		goto out;
+
+	err = ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vdda_phy,
+		"vdda-phy");
+
+	if (err)
+		goto out;
+
+	/* vddp-ref-clk-* properties are optional */
+	__ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vddp_ref_clk,
+				 "vddp-ref-clk", true);
+out:
+	return err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_init_vregulators);
+
 static
 int ufs_qcom_phy_cfg_vreg(struct device *dev,
 			  struct ufs_qcom_phy_vreg *vreg, bool on)
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-18 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-18 14:28 [PATCH v2 00/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Clean up qcom-ufs phy and ufs-qcom hcd Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] phy: qcom-ufs: remove failure when rx/tx_iface_clk are absent Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 18:38   ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-18 21:18   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-19 17:20     ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-29 20:21       ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove unnecessary BUG_ON Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Use devm sibling of kstrdup for regulator names Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] phy: qcom-ufs-qmp-xx: Discard remove callback for drivers Vivek Gautam
2016-10-26 20:20   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-10-29 20:16     ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Cleanup clock and regulator initialization Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` Vivek Gautam [this message]
2016-10-18 18:41   ` [PATCH v2 06/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove unnecessary function declarations Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] phy: qcom-ufs-qmp-xx: Move clock and regulator init out of phy init Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH 08/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Refactoring phy clock handling Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 20:13   ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-19 17:45     ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-19 19:18       ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-20  3:44         ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] scsi/ufs: qcom: Add phy_exit call in hcd exit path Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 20:19   ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove common layer phy exit callback Vivek Gautam
2016-10-19  0:07   ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-25  0:40 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Clean up qcom-ufs phy and ufs-qcom hcd Martin K. Petersen
2016-10-25  6:00   ` Vivek Gautam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1476800897-19898-7-git-send-email-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
    --to=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=subhashj@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=vinholikatti@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).