From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] megaraid_sas: Do not set MPI2_TYPE_CUDA for JBOD FP path for FW which does not support JBOD sequence map Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 07:51:28 -0400 Message-ID: <1476964288.3094.4.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1476954305-576-1-git-send-email-sumit.saxena@broadcom.com> <1476954305-576-7-git-send-email-sumit.saxena@broadcom.com> <20161020091526.GA22193@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20161020091526.GA22193@kroah.com> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH , Sumit Saxena Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com, thenzl@redhat.com, kashyap.desai@broadcom.com, stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 11:15 +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 02:05:04AM -0700, Sumit Saxena wrote: > > CC: stable@vger.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Sumit Saxena > > Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke > > Reviewed-by: Tomas Henzl > > --- > > drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c | 8 ++++---- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > I know I reject patches without any changelog text in them, hopefully > the scsi maintainers also do... It depends: for complex patches needing detailed explanations, yes. However, this is a four line change for which the subject seems adequately descriptive, so this particular one seems fine. James