Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>
To: "jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"krisman@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <krisman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"gabriel@krisman.be" <gabriel@krisman.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] scsi: Handle Unit Attention when issuing SCSI command
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:15:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1477498520.2550.1.camel@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1477497160.2724.11.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 08:52 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 08:42 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > Can you elaborate on this? Since the sense buffer is available in 
> > scsi_io_completion() and since that function already calls 
> > scsi_command_normalize_sense() this function seems like a good 
> > candidate to me to add retry logic for REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC requests.
> 
> UAs are used to signal AENs to userspace control processes that use
> BLOCK_PC, like CD changers, burners and scanners.  If we eat UAs
> inside scsi_io_completion(), we could potentially break any userspace
> control system that relies on AENs.

Ignoring the SCSI error handler, the call sequence for reporting UAs to
user space is as follows: scsi_softirq_done() ->
scsi_decide_disposition() -> scsi_check_sense() -> scsi_report_sense().
This means that scsi_report_sense() is called before
scsi_io_completion() is called. I think this means that what
scsi_io_completion() decides cannot affect UA reporting to user space?

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-26 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-24  3:20 [PATCH v3 1/2] scsi: Handle Unit Attention when issuing SCSI command Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2016-10-24  3:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] scsi: sr: Drop custom handling of unit attention Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2016-10-25 13:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] scsi: Handle Unit Attention when issuing SCSI command Benjamin Block
2016-10-25 22:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-10-25 22:23   ` James Bottomley
2016-10-25 23:18     ` Bart Van Assche
2016-10-25 23:50       ` James Bottomley
2016-10-26 15:42         ` Bart Van Assche
2016-10-26 15:52           ` James Bottomley
2016-10-26 16:15             ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2016-10-26 17:38               ` Brian King
2016-10-27  9:00                 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-10-28  7:32                   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1477498520.2550.1.camel@sandisk.com \
    --to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gabriel@krisman.be \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=krisman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox