From: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid that SCSI device removal through sysfs triggers a deadlock
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 07:47:20 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1478267240.3287.8.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96320196-4074-c970-97f0-bffb74713990@sandisk.com>
On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 16:27 -0600, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 10/28/2016 08:08 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > This is a deadlock caused by an inversion issue in kernfs (suicide
> > vs
> > non-suicide removes); so fixing it in SCSI alone really isn't
> > appropriate. I count at least five other subsystems all using this
> > mechanism, so they'll all be similarly affected. It looks to be
> > fairly
> > simply fixable inside kernfs, so please fix it that way.
>
> Hello James,
>
> How about fixing this deadlock with the below patch?
Without a description file, it's a bit hard to follow, but reading the
patch it's somewhat cumbersome and also incomplete: you change the API
for self removal, so every driver that uses the
device_remove_file_self() scheme (about five of them) has to be
changed. I was actually thinking of something much simpler:
You know after
if (device_remove_file_self(dev, attr))
returns true that s_active is held and also that KERNFS_SUICIDAL is set
on the node, so the non-self remove paths can simply check for this
flag and return without descending into __kernfs_remove(), which would
mean they never take s_active. That means we never get the inversion.
This should be about a 10 line patch because there are only two places
this check needs to be done: kernfs_remove() and
kernfs_remove_by_name_ns().
It has the advantage that the api isn't altered so all the other driver
callers simply pick up the benefit.
There may be a bit of back end cleanup to do on the eventual parent
directory removal because I think it needs to wait for all the suicidal
nodes to signal they've finally suicided.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-04 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-26 18:44 [PATCH] Avoid that SCSI device removal through sysfs triggers a deadlock Bart Van Assche
2016-10-27 9:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-10-27 15:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-10-27 9:46 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-10-27 15:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-10-29 0:12 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-10-29 2:08 ` James Bottomley
2016-10-30 19:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-10-30 20:25 ` James Bottomley
2016-11-03 22:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-04 13:47 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2016-11-04 18:17 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-07 20:51 ` James Bottomley
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-11-08 0:32 Bart Van Assche
2016-11-08 7:01 ` Greg KH
2016-11-08 15:34 ` James Bottomley
2016-11-08 15:28 ` James Bottomley
2016-11-08 16:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-08 18:01 ` James Bottomley
2016-11-08 19:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-11-08 23:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-09 1:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-11-08 23:44 ` James Bottomley
2016-11-09 0:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-11-09 1:43 ` James Bottomley
2016-11-09 2:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-11-11 1:37 ` James Bottomley
2016-11-11 4:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-06-26 22:25 Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1478267240.3287.8.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).