From: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
To: vinholikatti@gmail.com, jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com
Cc: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>,
"open list:UNIVERSAL FLASH STORAGE HOST CONTROLLER DRIVER"
<linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 10/11] scsi: ufs: optimize system suspend handling
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 16:33:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1479947588-7297-1-git-send-email-subhashj@codeaurora.org> (raw)
Consider following sequence of events:
1. UFS is runtime suspended, link_state = Hibern8, device_state = sleep
2. System goes into system suspend, ufshcd_system_suspend() brings both
link and device to active state and then puts the device in Power_Down
state and link in OFF state.
3. System resumes at some later point in time, ufshcd_system_resume()
doesn't do anything as UFS state is runtime suspended. Note that link
is still on OFF state and device is in Power_Down state.
4. Now system again goes into suspend without any UFS accesses before it.
ufshcd_system_suspend() again brings both link and device to active
state and then puts the device in Power_Down state and link if OFF
state. But it's unnecessary to bring the link & device in active state
as both link and device are already in desired low power states. This
change fixes this issue by adding proper state checks in
ufshcd_system_suspend().
Reviewed-by: Gilad Broner <gbroner@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 15 ++++++---------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index b826078..4b6cc07 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -6272,16 +6272,13 @@ int ufshcd_system_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba)
if (!hba || !hba->is_powered)
return 0;
- if (pm_runtime_suspended(hba->dev)) {
- if (hba->rpm_lvl == hba->spm_lvl)
- /*
- * There is possibility that device may still be in
- * active state during the runtime suspend.
- */
- if ((ufs_get_pm_lvl_to_dev_pwr_mode(hba->spm_lvl) ==
- hba->curr_dev_pwr_mode) && !hba->auto_bkops_enabled)
- goto out;
+ if ((ufs_get_pm_lvl_to_dev_pwr_mode(hba->spm_lvl) ==
+ hba->curr_dev_pwr_mode) &&
+ (ufs_get_pm_lvl_to_link_pwr_state(hba->spm_lvl) ==
+ hba->uic_link_state))
+ goto out;
+ if (pm_runtime_suspended(hba->dev)) {
/*
* UFS device and/or UFS link low power states during runtime
* suspend seems to be different than what is expected during
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
reply other threads:[~2016-11-24 0:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1479947588-7297-1-git-send-email-subhashj@codeaurora.org \
--to=subhashj@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=vinholikatti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).