From: "Ewan D. Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Cc: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>,
Eyal Ben David <bdeyal@gmail.com>,
dgilbert@interlog.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SG does not ignore dxferp (direct io + mmap)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:26:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1480523188.28416.94.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1194718949.74785.1480096576577.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
On Fri, 2016-11-25 at 12:56 -0500, Ewan Milne wrote:
> I think what we need to understand is what caused the regression in the
> first place, I probably should have been bisecting the original failure
> rather than trying to find where it started working.
>
Bisecting leads to this commit:
commit 37f19e57a0de3c4a3417aa13ff4d04f1e0dee4b3
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: Sun Jan 18 16:16:33 2015 +0100
block: merge __bio_map_user_iov into bio_map_user_iov
And also remove the unused bdev argument.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Specifically, the problem appears to be caused by the removal of
the setting of bio->bi_bdev, which would previously be set to NULL.
If I add:
diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
index 0723d4c..ecac37b 100644
--- a/block/bio.c
+++ b/block/bio.c
@@ -1351,6 +1351,7 @@ struct bio *bio_map_user_iov(struct request_queue
*q,
if (iter->type & WRITE)
bio->bi_rw |= REQ_WRITE;
+ bio->bi_bdev = NULL;
bio->bi_flags |= (1 << BIO_USER_MAPPED);
/*
The test passes (no zero byte corruption).
Setting dxferp would cause map_data.null_mapped to be set before it
is passed to blk_rq_map_user(_iov) which would cause a difference in
behavior.
-Ewan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-30 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-20 16:02 SG does not ignore dxferp (direct io + mmap) Eyal Ben David
2016-11-21 0:04 ` Laurence Oberman
2016-11-21 9:23 ` Eyal Ben David
2016-11-21 14:24 ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-11-21 14:54 ` Laurence Oberman
2016-11-21 14:55 ` Eyal Ben David
2016-11-21 15:12 ` Laurence Oberman
2016-11-21 15:15 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-11-21 15:44 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-11-21 16:04 ` Eyal Ben David
2016-11-21 16:25 ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-11-21 17:34 ` Douglas Gilbert
2016-11-21 18:24 ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-11-22 8:37 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-11-22 13:48 ` Eyal Ben David
2016-11-22 15:31 ` Laurence Oberman
2016-11-22 16:00 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-11-22 16:28 ` Eyal Ben David
2016-11-22 18:30 ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-11-22 18:46 ` Laurence Oberman
2016-11-22 20:55 ` Eyal Ben David
2016-11-23 18:55 ` Laurence Oberman
2016-11-23 20:22 ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-11-25 8:07 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-11-25 11:20 ` Eyal Ben David
2016-11-25 11:53 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-11-25 12:28 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-11-25 12:36 ` Eyal Ben David
2016-11-25 14:46 ` Laurence Oberman
2016-11-28 10:30 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-11-25 17:56 ` Ewan Milne
2016-11-25 18:01 ` Laurence Oberman
2016-11-30 16:26 ` Ewan D. Milne [this message]
2016-12-01 13:40 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-12-02 12:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-02 13:29 ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-12-02 14:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-12-02 14:17 ` Laurence Oberman
2016-12-02 19:29 ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-12-02 20:37 ` Ewan D. Milne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1480523188.28416.94.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=bdeyal@gmail.com \
--cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).