linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ewan D. Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>
To: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
	Wei Fang <fangwei1@huawei.com>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: avoid a permanent stop of the scsi device's request queue
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 15:30:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1481142648.28416.244.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1481141375.2354.53.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 12:09 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> Hm, it looks like the state set in scsi_sysfs_add_sdev() is bogus.  We
> expect the state to have been properly set before that (in
> scsi_add_lun), so can we not simply remove it?
> 
> James
> 

I was considering that, but...

enum scsi_device_state {
        SDEV_CREATED = 1,       /* device created but not added to sysfs                                                                                                                                           
                                 * Only internal commands allowed (for inq) */

So it seems the intent was for the state to not change until then.

The call to set the SDEV_RUNNING state earlier in scsi_add_lun()
was added with:

commit 6f4267e3bd1211b3d09130e626b0b3d885077610
Author: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Date:   Fri Aug 22 16:53:31 2008 -0500

    [SCSI] Update the SCSI state model to allow blocking in the created state

Which allows the device to go into ->BLOCK (which is needed, since it
actually happens).

Should we remove the call from scsi_sysfs_add_sdev() and change the
comment in scsi_device.h to reflect the intent?

I have not verified the async vs. non-async scan path yet but it looks
like it would be OK.

-Ewan



  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-07 20:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-06  9:12 [PATCH] scsi: avoid a permanent stop of the scsi device's request queue Wei Fang
2016-12-06 15:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-07  1:20   ` Wei Fang
2016-12-07  2:45     ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-07  3:41       ` Wei Fang
2016-12-07  4:40         ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-07  6:59           ` Wei Fang
2016-12-07 16:48             ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-07 16:55               ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-07 17:40                 ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-12-07 18:16                   ` James Bottomley
2016-12-07 19:24                     ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-12-07 20:09                       ` James Bottomley
2016-12-07 20:30                         ` Ewan D. Milne [this message]
2016-12-07 23:43                           ` James Bottomley
2016-12-08  2:28                             ` Wei Fang
2016-12-08  2:33                               ` James Bottomley
2016-12-08  3:22                                 ` Wei Fang
2016-12-08  6:38                                   ` Wei Fang
2016-12-08 14:04                                     ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-12-08 15:39                                   ` James Bottomley
2016-12-09  1:08                                     ` Wei Fang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1481142648.28416.244.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=emilne@redhat.com \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=fangwei1@huawei.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).