linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Wei Fang <fangwei1@huawei.com>, emilne@redhat.com
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	chenzengxi@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: avoid a permanent stop of the scsi device's request queue
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 18:33:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1481164381.2354.81.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5848C535.5010408@huawei.com>

On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 10:28 +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> Hi, James, Ewan,
> 
> On 2016/12/8 7:43, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 15:30 -0500, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 12:09 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > Hm, it looks like the state set in scsi_sysfs_add_sdev() is
> > > > bogus. 
> > > >  We expect the state to have been properly set before that (in
> > > > scsi_add_lun), so can we not simply remove it?
> > > > 
> > > > James
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I was considering that, but...
> > > 
> > > enum scsi_device_state {
> > >         SDEV_CREATED = 1,       /* device created but not added
> > > to
> > > sysfs                                                            
> > >     
> > >                                                                  
> > >     
> > >       
> > >                                  * Only internal commands allowed
> > > (for inq) */
> > > 
> > > So it seems the intent was for the state to not change until
> > > then.
> > 
> > I think this is historical.  There was a change somewhere that
> > moved
> > the sysfs state handling out of the sdev stat to is_visible, so the
> > sdev state no-longer reflects  it.
> > 
> > > The call to set the SDEV_RUNNING state earlier in scsi_add_lun()
> > > was added with:
> > > 
> > > commit 6f4267e3bd1211b3d09130e626b0b3d885077610
> > > Author: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> > > Date:   Fri Aug 22 16:53:31 2008 -0500
> > > 
> > >     [SCSI] Update the SCSI state model to allow blocking in the
> > > created state
> > > 
> > > Which allows the device to go into ->BLOCK (which is needed,
> > > since it
> > > actually happens).
> > > 
> > > Should we remove the call from scsi_sysfs_add_sdev() and change
> > > the
> > > comment in scsi_device.h to reflect the intent?
> 
> This sounds reasonable.
> 
> > Assuming someone with the problem actually tests it, yes.
> 
> This problem can be stably reproduced on Zengxi Chen's machine, who
> reported the bug. We can test it on this machine.
> 
> The patch is as below, just for sure:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
> index 0734927..82dfe07 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
> @@ -1204,10 +1204,6 @@ int scsi_sysfs_add_sdev(struct scsi_device
> *sdev)
>         struct request_queue *rq = sdev->request_queue;
>         struct scsi_target *starget = sdev->sdev_target;
> 
> -       error = scsi_device_set_state(sdev, SDEV_RUNNING);
> -       if (error)
> -               return error;
> -

That's it, although not the second hunk: CREATED still means device not
added to sysfs.  It's just that RUNNING now doesn't mean it is.

James



  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-08  2:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-06  9:12 [PATCH] scsi: avoid a permanent stop of the scsi device's request queue Wei Fang
2016-12-06 15:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-07  1:20   ` Wei Fang
2016-12-07  2:45     ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-07  3:41       ` Wei Fang
2016-12-07  4:40         ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-07  6:59           ` Wei Fang
2016-12-07 16:48             ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-07 16:55               ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-07 17:40                 ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-12-07 18:16                   ` James Bottomley
2016-12-07 19:24                     ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-12-07 20:09                       ` James Bottomley
2016-12-07 20:30                         ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-12-07 23:43                           ` James Bottomley
2016-12-08  2:28                             ` Wei Fang
2016-12-08  2:33                               ` James Bottomley [this message]
2016-12-08  3:22                                 ` Wei Fang
2016-12-08  6:38                                   ` Wei Fang
2016-12-08 14:04                                     ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-12-08 15:39                                   ` James Bottomley
2016-12-09  1:08                                     ` Wei Fang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1481164381.2354.81.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=chenzengxi@huawei.com \
    --cc=emilne@redhat.com \
    --cc=fangwei1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).