From: Wei Fang <fangwei1@huawei.com>
To: jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, bart.vanassche@sandisk.com,
emilne@redhat.com, chenzengxi@huawei.com,
Wei Fang <fangwei1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4] scsi: avoid a permanent stop of the scsi device's request queue
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 09:25:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1481592321-10796-1-git-send-email-fangwei1@huawei.com> (raw)
A race between scanning and fc_remote_port_delete() may result in a
permanent stop if the device gets blocked before scsi_sysfs_add_sdev()
and unblocked after. The reason is that blocking a device sets both
the SDEV_BLOCKED state and the QUEUE_FLAG_STOPPED. However,
scsi_sysfs_add_sdev() unconditionally sets SDEV_RUNNING which causes
the device to be ignored by scsi_target_unblock() and thus never have
its QUEUE_FLAG_STOPPED cleared leading to a device which is apparently
running but has a stopped queue.
We actually have two places where SDEV_RUNNING is set: once in
scsi_add_lun() which respects the blocked flag and once in
scsi_sysfs_add_sdev() which doesn't. Since the second set is entirely
spurious, simply remove it to fix the problem.
Reported-by: Zengxi Chen <chenzengxi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <fangwei1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
---
Changes v1->v2:
- don't modify scsi_internal_device_unblock(), just remove changing
state to SDEV_RUNNING in scsi_sysfs_add_sdev(), suggested by
James Bottomley and Ewan D. Milne.
Changes v2->v3
- Use a clearer description of this problem
Changes v3->v4
- Remove useless change of comment about SDEV_RUNNING
drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
index 0734927..82dfe07 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
@@ -1204,10 +1204,6 @@ int scsi_sysfs_add_sdev(struct scsi_device *sdev)
struct request_queue *rq = sdev->request_queue;
struct scsi_target *starget = sdev->sdev_target;
- error = scsi_device_set_state(sdev, SDEV_RUNNING);
- if (error)
- return error;
-
error = scsi_target_add(starget);
if (error)
return error;
--
2.4.11
next reply other threads:[~2016-12-13 1:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-13 1:25 Wei Fang [this message]
2016-12-14 20:52 ` [PATCH v4] scsi: avoid a permanent stop of the scsi device's request queue Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1481592321-10796-1-git-send-email-fangwei1@huawei.com \
--to=fangwei1@huawei.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=chenzengxi@huawei.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).