From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 5/5] scsi: make asynchronous aborts mandatory Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 22:53:57 +0000 Message-ID: <1488236023.2597.10.camel@sandisk.com> References: <1487779650-1338-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <1487779650-1338-6-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from esa2.hgst.iphmx.com ([68.232.143.124]:7659 "EHLO esa2.hgst.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751865AbdB1BBU (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2017 20:01:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1487779650-1338-6-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: <5AE9271FA0E03C47927F857FCB794F70@sandisk.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "hare@suse.de" , "martin.petersen@oracle.com" Cc: "hch@lst.de" , "james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "jth@kernel.org" On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 17:07 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > There hasn't been any reports for HBAs where asynchronous abort > would not work, so we should make it mandatory and remove > the fallback. Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche =