From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"israelr@mellanox.com" <israelr@mellanox.com>
Cc: "maxg@mellanox.com" <maxg@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi_sysfs: fix hang when removing scsi device
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 14:55:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1489442133.23810.24.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1489437175.2658.17.camel@sandisk.com>
On Mon, 2017-03-13 at 20:33 +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-03-13 at 12:23 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-03-13 at 18:49 +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> > > index 7bfbcfa7af40..b3bb49d06943 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> > > @@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_device_get);
> > > */
> > > void scsi_device_put(struct scsi_device *sdev)
> > > {
> > > - module_put(sdev->host->hostt->module);
> > > + module_put(sdev->hostt->module);
> > > put_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_device_put);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> > > index 6f7128f49c30..7134487abbb1 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> > > @@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ static struct scsi_device
> > > *scsi_alloc_sdev(struct
> > > scsi_target *starget,
> > > sdev->model = scsi_null_device_strs;
> > > sdev->rev = scsi_null_device_strs;
> > > sdev->host = shost;
> > > + sdev->hostt = shost->hostt;
> > > sdev->queue_ramp_up_period = SCSI_DEFAULT_RAMP_UP_PERIOD;
> > > sdev->id = starget->id;
> > > sdev->lun = lun;
> > > diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
> > > b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
> > > index 6f22b39f1b0c..cda620ed5922 100644
> > > --- a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
> > > +++ b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
> > > @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ struct scsi_event {
> > >
> > > struct scsi_device {
> > > struct Scsi_Host *host;
> > > + struct scsi_host_template *hostt;
> > > struct request_queue *request_queue;
> > >
> >
> > The apparent assumption behind this patch is that sdev->host can be
> > freed but the sdev will still exist? That shouldn't be correct:
> > the
> > rule for struct devices is that the child always holds the parent
> > and
> > the host is parented (albeit not necessarily directly) to the sdev,
> > so
> > it looks like something has gone wrong if the host had been freed
> > before the sdev.
>
> Hello James,
>
> scsi_remove_host() decreases the sdev reference count but does not
> wait until the sdev release work has finished. This is why the SCSI
> host can already have disappeared before the last scsi_device_put()
> call occurs.
This is true, but I don't see how it can cause the host to be freed
before the sdev. The memory for struct Scsi_Host is freed in the
shost_gendev release routine, which should be pinned by the parent
traversal from sdev. So it should not be possible for
scsi_host_dev_release() to be called before
scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext() becase the latter has the final
put of the parent device.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-13 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-09 16:37 [PATCH v2] scsi_sysfs: fix hang when removing scsi device Israel Rukshin
2017-03-09 19:36 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-12 10:26 ` Israel Rukshin
2017-03-13 18:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-13 19:23 ` James Bottomley
2017-03-13 20:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-13 21:55 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2017-03-14 2:35 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-14 9:44 ` Israel Rukshin
2017-03-14 14:23 ` Israel Rukshin
2017-03-15 23:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-16 9:02 ` Israel Rukshin
2017-03-16 15:42 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-16 15:59 ` Israel Rukshin
2017-03-16 23:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-18 0:05 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-18 11:17 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-03-18 15:28 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1489442133.23810.24.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com \
--cc=israelr@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxg@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox