From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] hpsa: limit outstanding rescans Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:23:39 -0700 Message-ID: <1489598619.2387.22.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <148917802486.17050.17178463722401202189.stgit@brunhilda> <148917811749.17050.10796225321668028334.stgit@brunhilda> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:45715 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751014AbdCORXw (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:23:52 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.20/8.16.0.20) with SMTP id v2FHNfOs130884 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:23:50 -0400 Received: from e13.ny.us.ibm.com (e13.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.203]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 296nfyrm3f-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:23:50 -0400 Received: from localhost by e13.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:23:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <148917811749.17050.10796225321668028334.stgit@brunhilda> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Don Brace , joseph.szczypek@hpe.com, gerry.morong@microsemi.com, john.hall@microsemi.com, Kevin.Barnett@microsemi.com, Mahesh.Rajashekhara@microsemi.com, bader.alisaleh@microsemi.com, hch@infradead.org, scott.teel@microsemi.com, Viswas.G@microsemi.com, Justin.Lindley@microsemi.com, scott.benesh@microsemi.com, POSWALD@suse.com Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 14:35 -0600, Don Brace wrote: > avoid rescan storms. No need to queue another > if one is pending. > > Reviewed-by: Scott Benesh > Reviewed-by: Scott Teel > Reviewed-by: Tomas Henzl review Guys, what is this additional "review" for? I just noticed because my reply scripts barfed on it. Please don't add extra junk after an email address in a tag line. Thanks, James