From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>
To: "James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com"
<James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"israelr@mellanox.com" <israelr@mellanox.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Avoid that __scsi_remove_device() hangs
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:40:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1492530014.2689.3.camel@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <63e7faf7-f4e7-9e5c-dad5-ec59032df698@mellanox.com>
On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 14:58 +0300, Israel Rukshin wrote:
> I tested those patches and I got a NULL dereference at sd_sync_cache_done().
> The test is unloading ib_srp while one port is down.
> The previous version worked fine.
>
> From the log:
> [ 190.272412] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> 00000000000002f0
> [ 190.281102] IP: sd_sync_cache_done+0x1b/0x80 [sd_mod]
Hello Israel,
Thanks for testing. I assume that this data refers to the sd_printk() statement?
That statement was executed properly in my tests. Anyway, I will leave out that
statement, retest and repost this patch series. There is a del_gendisk() call in
sd just before the sd_shutdown() call so that means it's not safe to access the
disk pointer from anywhere in sd_shutdown().
Bart.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-18 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-17 17:34 [PATCH v3 0/4] Avoid that __scsi_remove_device() hangs Bart Van Assche
2017-04-17 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] Introduce scsi_start_queue() Bart Van Assche
2017-04-17 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] Introduce scsi_execute_async() Bart Van Assche
2017-04-17 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] sd: Make synchronize cache upon shutdown asynchronous Bart Van Assche
2017-04-18 14:44 ` Benjamin Block
2017-04-18 15:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-18 15:56 ` James Bottomley
2017-04-18 16:06 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-18 23:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-18 23:56 ` James Bottomley
2017-04-19 0:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-19 0:05 ` James Bottomley
2017-04-19 18:42 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-20 21:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-20 22:13 ` James Bottomley
2017-04-20 22:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-20 22:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-23 17:28 ` James Bottomley
2017-04-24 21:46 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-26 18:53 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-28 18:45 ` James Bottomley
2017-04-24 7:14 ` [lkp-robot] [sd] ab1218235c: INFO:possible_recursive_locking_detected kernel test robot
2017-04-17 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] Avoid that __scsi_remove_device() hangs Bart Van Assche
2017-04-18 11:58 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] " Israel Rukshin
2017-04-18 15:40 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1492530014.2689.3.camel@sandisk.com \
--to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=israelr@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox