From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/23] dm rq: don't pass irrelevant error code to blk_mq_complete_request Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 15:25:37 +0000 Message-ID: <1492701936.2642.2.camel@sandisk.com> References: <20170420140316.6546-1-hch@lst.de> <20170420140316.6546-12-hch@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from esa4.hgst.iphmx.com ([216.71.154.42]:30987 "EHLO esa4.hgst.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S970449AbdDTPZr (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2017 11:25:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170420140316.6546-12-hch@lst.de> Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: <9C046D22DD58794785BF0A2BAAF51875@namprd04.prod.outlook.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "hch@lst.de" , "axboe@kernel.dk" Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "konrad.wilk@oracle.com" , "roger.pau@citrix.com" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , "jbacik@fb.com" , "james.smart@broadcom.com" , "dm-devel@redhat.com" On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 16:03 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > dm never uses rq->errors, so there is no need to pass an error argument > to blk_mq_complete_request. Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche =