public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [BUG] lockdep splat with cpu_hotplug_lock
       [not found] <20170720193501.4f09499f@gandalf.local.home>
@ 2017-07-20 23:48 ` James Bottomley
  2017-07-21  9:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2017-07-20 23:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steven Rostedt, LKML, linux-scsi
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, QLogic-Storage-Upstream, martin.petersen

[redirecting to linux-scsi]
On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 19:35 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> My tests triggered this splat on 4.13-rc1:
> 
> Loading iSCSI transport class v2.0-870.
> QLogic NetXtreme II iSCSI Driver bnx2i v2.7.10.1 (Jul 16, 2014)
> iscsi: registered transport (bnx2i)
> 
> ============================================
> WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
> 4.13.0-rc1-test+ #2 Not tainted
> --------------------------------------------
> swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock:
>  (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffffb505329e>]
> __cpuhp_setup_state+0x28/0x59
> 
> but task is already holding lock:
>  (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffffb64d54e9>]
> bnx2i_mod_init+0x134/0x209
> 
> other info that might help us debug this:
>  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> 
>        CPU0
>        ----
>   lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem);
>   lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem);
> 
>  *** DEADLOCK ***
> 
>  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
> 
> 1 lock held by swapper/0/1:
>  #0:  (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffffb64d54e9>]
> bnx2i_mod_init+0x134/0x209
> 
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 2 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.13.0-rc1-test+ #2
> Hardware name: MSI MS-7823/CSM-H87M-G43 (MS-7823), BIOS V1.6
> 02/22/2014
> Call Trace:
>  dump_stack+0x68/0x92
>  __lock_acquire+0x84b/0xebb
>  ? __lock_is_held+0x47/0x7a
>  ? mark_held_locks+0x5e/0x74
>  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x40/0x47
>  lock_acquire+0x108/0x19c
>  ? lock_acquire+0x108/0x19c
>  ? __cpuhp_setup_state+0x28/0x59
>  cpus_read_lock+0x2f/0x5f
>  ? __cpuhp_setup_state+0x28/0x59
>  __cpuhp_setup_state+0x28/0x59
>  ? bnx2i_percpu_thread_create+0x79/0x79
>  bnx2i_mod_init+0x17a/0x209
>  ? iscsi_transport_init+0x1c1/0x1c1
>  ? set_debug_rodata+0x17/0x17
>  do_one_initcall+0x90/0x131
>  ? set_debug_rodata+0x17/0x17
>  kernel_init_freeable+0x1e5/0x26d
>  ? rest_init+0xd8/0xd8
>  kernel_init+0xe/0xfa
>  ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40
> ahci 0000:00:1f.2: version 3.0
> ahci 0000:00:1f.2: AHCI 0001.0300 32 slots 6 ports 6 Gbps 0x3 impl
> SATA mode
> ahci 0000:00:1f.2: flags: 64bit ncq led clo pio slum part ems apst
> scsi host0: ahci
> 
> I'd let the powers that be figure it out.

It sounds like it's an annotation issue not an actual problem.  I've
added the correct list, so hopefully our usual enthusiasts can take a
look.

James

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [BUG] lockdep splat with cpu_hotplug_lock
  2017-07-20 23:48 ` [BUG] lockdep splat with cpu_hotplug_lock James Bottomley
@ 2017-07-21  9:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2017-07-21  9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Bottomley
  Cc: Steven Rostedt, LKML, linux-scsi, QLogic-Storage-Upstream,
	martin.petersen

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1280 bytes --]

On Thu, 20 Jul 2017, James Bottomley wrote:
> [redirecting to linux-scsi]
> On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 19:35 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > My tests triggered this splat on 4.13-rc1:
> > 
> > Loading iSCSI transport class v2.0-870.
> > QLogic NetXtreme II iSCSI Driver bnx2i v2.7.10.1 (Jul 16, 2014)
> > iscsi: registered transport (bnx2i)
> > 
> > ============================================
> > WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
> > 4.13.0-rc1-test+ #2 Not tainted
> > --------------------------------------------
> > swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock:
> >  (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffffb505329e>]
> > __cpuhp_setup_state+0x28/0x59
> > 
> > but task is already holding lock:
> >  (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffffb64d54e9>]
> > bnx2i_mod_init+0x134/0x209
> > 
> > other info that might help us debug this:
> >  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> > 
> >        CPU0
> >        ----
> >   lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem);
> >   lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem);
> 
> It sounds like it's an annotation issue not an actual problem.  I've
> added the correct list, so hopefully our usual enthusiasts can take a
> look.

Nope. It's a recursive locking/\ of cpuhotplug lock. I'll have a look on
monday.

Thanks,

	tglx


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-07-21  9:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20170720193501.4f09499f@gandalf.local.home>
2017-07-20 23:48 ` [BUG] lockdep splat with cpu_hotplug_lock James Bottomley
2017-07-21  9:42   ` Thomas Gleixner

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox