public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
To: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"hare@suse.com" <hare@suse.com>,
	"jthumshirn@suse.de" <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve requeuing behavior
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 17:17:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1503595075.2702.21.camel@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170824165704.GA28901@lst.de>

On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 18:57 +0200, hch@lst.de wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:14:22PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > Commit ca18d6f769d2 ("block: Make most scsi_req_init() calls implicit")
> > introduced the scsi_initialize_rq() function in such a way that it is not only
> > called for pass-through requests but also for FS requests. Because that commit
> > sets .initialize_rq_fn for both blk-sq and blk-mq blk_get_request() now calls
> > scsi_initialize_rq() for all SCSI requests. Or did I perhaps overlook something?
> 
> initialize_rq_fn is only called from blk_get_request, which is not
> called for normal file system read/write/flush/discard request.
> 
> Also unless my memory fails me that's something that I and Jens requested
> to be changed from your original version.

Hello Christoph,

Is one of the following two approaches perhaps what you had in mind?
* Adding an .initialize_rq_fn() call to multiple blk_rq_init() and
  blk_mq_rq_ctx_init() callers, e.g. blk_mq_make_request(), __get_request(),
  blk_kick_flush() and scsi_ioctl_reset().
* Moving the .initialize_rq_fn() call from blk_get_request() into blk_rq_init()
  and blk_mq_rq_ctx_init() (see also
  https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg108934.html).

Thanks,

Bart.

      reply	other threads:[~2017-08-24 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-23 21:05 [PATCH] Improve requeuing behavior Bart Van Assche
2017-08-24 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-24 16:14   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-08-24 16:57     ` hch
2017-08-24 17:17       ` Bart Van Assche [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1503595075.2702.21.camel@wdc.com \
    --to=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
    --cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox