From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
To: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
"viswas.g@microsemi.com" <viswas.g@microsemi.com>,
"gerry.morong@microsemi.com" <gerry.morong@microsemi.com>,
"mahesh.rajashekhara@microsemi.com"
<mahesh.rajashekhara@microsemi.com>,
"POSWALD@suse.com" <POSWALD@suse.com>,
"scott.benesh@microsemi.com" <scott.benesh@microsemi.com>,
"don.brace@microsemi.com" <don.brace@microsemi.com>,
"bader.alisaleh@microsemi.com" <bader.alisaleh@microsemi.com>,
"kevin.barnett@microsemi.com" <kevin.barnett@microsemi.com>,
"joseph.szczypek@hpe.com" <joseph.szczypek@hpe.com>,
"scott.teel@microsemi.com" <scott.teel@microsemi.com>,
"jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"justin.lindley@microsemi.com" <justin.lindley@microsemi.com>,
"John.Hall@microsemi.com" <John.Hall@microsemi.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sd: preserve sysfs updates to max_sectors_kb
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 18:13:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1504030401.2653.43.camel@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4993A297653ECB4581FA5C3C31323D195B8E9103@avsrvexchmbx1.microsemi.net>
On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 17:42 +0000, Don Brace wrote:
> From: Don Brace
> > [ ... ]
> > Hello Don,
> >
> > Can you have another look at the udev rules on your test system? The last
> > rule in 60-block.rules looks like a watch rule to me. The same holds for the
> > upstream version of that file
> > (https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/maste
> > r/rules/60-block.rules).
> >
> > Bart.
>
> It is a watch rule.
>
> systemd/src/udev/udevd.c
> manager_new
> manager->fd_inotify = udev_watch_init(manager->udev);
> sd_event_add_io(manager->event, &manager->inotify_event, manager->fd_inotify, EPOLLIN, on_inotify, manager);
> on_inotify (systemd source code: src/udev/udevd.c)
> synthesize_change
> ioctl --> BLKRRPART
>
> This rule ends up calling BLKRRPART.
Hello Don,
Sorry if I'm slow today, but it's not clear to me how the BLKRRPART ioctl
triggers a change of max_sectors_kb? And even if it really is this ioctl that
triggers a change of max_sectors_kb, should the kernel code that handles
max_sectors_kb writes be modified or should rather a udev rule be added that
sets max_sectors_kb to the desired value after each partition rescan?
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-29 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-18 21:00 [PATCH] sd: preserve sysfs updates to max_sectors_kb Don Brace
2017-08-18 21:05 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-08-18 21:29 ` Don Brace
2017-08-18 21:46 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-08-21 19:12 ` Don Brace
2017-08-21 19:53 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-08-21 20:14 ` Don Brace
2017-08-29 17:41 ` Don Brace
2017-08-29 17:42 ` Don Brace
2017-08-29 18:13 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2017-08-29 18:36 ` Don Brace
2017-08-29 19:41 ` Don Brace
2017-08-29 22:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-08-29 22:32 ` Don Brace
2017-08-29 23:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-08-30 1:24 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-09-09 10:32 ` Martin Wilck
2017-09-28 1:37 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-09-28 1:38 ` [PATCH] scsi: sd: Do not override max_sectors_kb sysfs setting Martin K. Petersen
2017-09-29 12:26 ` Martin Wilck
2017-09-29 13:46 ` Don Brace
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1504030401.2653.43.camel@wdc.com \
--to=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=John.Hall@microsemi.com \
--cc=POSWALD@suse.com \
--cc=bader.alisaleh@microsemi.com \
--cc=don.brace@microsemi.com \
--cc=gerry.morong@microsemi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=joseph.szczypek@hpe.com \
--cc=justin.lindley@microsemi.com \
--cc=kevin.barnett@microsemi.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mahesh.rajashekhara@microsemi.com \
--cc=scott.benesh@microsemi.com \
--cc=scott.teel@microsemi.com \
--cc=viswas.g@microsemi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox