From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
To: "ming.lei@redhat.com" <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
"sagi@grimberg.me" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"loberman@redhat.com" <loberman@redhat.com>,
"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] block: don't call blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() in case of BLK_STS_RESOURCE
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:18:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1505747894.2685.6.camel@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170917124000.GB6289@ming.t460p>
On Sun, 2017-09-17 at 20:40 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> "if no request has completed before the delay has expired" can't be a
> reason to rerun the queue, because the queue can still be busy.
That statement of you shows that there are important aspects of the SCSI
core and dm-mpath driver that you don't understand.
> I suggest to understand the root cause, instead of keeping this
> ugly random delay because run hw queue after 100ms may be useless
> in 99.99% times.
If you are still looking at removing the blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() calls
then I think you are looking in the wrong direction. What kind of problem
are you trying to solve? Is it perhaps that there can be a delay between
dm-mpath request completion and the queueing of a new request? If so,
adding a queue run call into the dm-mpath end_io callback is probably
sufficient and probably can replace this entire patch series.
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-18 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20170915164456.9803-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
2017-09-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] block: don't call blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() in case of BLK_STS_RESOURCE Ming Lei
2017-09-15 17:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-17 12:40 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-18 15:18 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2017-09-19 5:43 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 15:36 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 15:56 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 16:04 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 16:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 16:55 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 18:42 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 22:44 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 23:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 23:50 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-20 1:13 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-20 1:19 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 15:48 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 15:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 16:03 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 16:07 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1505747894.2685.6.camel@wdc.com \
--to=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox