From: "Ewan D. Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Frederick.Knight@netapp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sd: Limit WRITE SAME / WRITE SAME(16) w/UNMAP length for certain devices
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 12:27:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1506529677.4100.452.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq1wp4mcjvi.fsf@oracle.com>
On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 21:46 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> Ewan,
>
> > Some devices do not support a WRITE SAME / WRITE SAME(16) with the
> > UNMAP bit set up to the length specified in the MAXIMUM WRITE SAME
> > LENGTH field in the block limits VPD page (or, the field is zero,
> > indicating there is no limit). Limit the length by the MAXIMUM UNMAP
> > LBA COUNT value. Otherwise the command might be rejected.
>
> From SBC4:
>
> "A MAXIMUM UNMAP LBA COUNT field set to a non-zero value indicates the
> maximum number of LBAs that may be unmapped by an UNMAP command"
>
> Note that it explicitly states "UNMAP command" and not "unmap
> operation".
>
> "A MAXIMUM WRITE SAME LENGTH field set to a non-zero value indicates
> the maximum number of contiguous logical blocks that the device server
> allows to be unmapped or written in a single WRITE SAME command."
>
> It says "unmapped or written" and "WRITE SAME command".
>
> The spec is crystal clear. The device needs to be fixed. We can
> blacklist older firmware revs.
>
Yes, I know that is what SBC-4 says, and I agree that the devices
are not conforming. Unfortunately, I've come across 3 different
arrays now from 3 different manufacturers that exhibit this behavior.
cc: Fred Knight for his opinion on this (NetApp was not one of the
arrays that I've run into, though).
-Ewan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-27 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-19 16:14 [PATCH] sd: Limit WRITE SAME / WRITE SAME(16) w/UNMAP length for certain devices Ewan D. Milne
2017-09-19 17:32 ` Kuzeja, William
2017-09-26 1:46 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-09-27 16:27 ` Ewan D. Milne [this message]
2017-09-27 16:42 ` Knight, Frederick
2017-09-28 1:34 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-09-28 1:35 ` [PATCH] scsi: sd: Implement blacklist option for WRITE SAME w/ UNMAP Martin K. Petersen
2017-09-28 15:46 ` Ewan D. Milne
2017-09-29 10:02 ` Laurence Oberman
2017-09-29 13:21 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-09-29 14:01 ` Laurence Oberman
2017-10-17 14:26 ` Laurence Oberman
2017-10-17 14:43 ` Laurence Oberman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1506529677.4100.452.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=Frederick.Knight@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).