From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
To: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"ming.lei@redhat.com" <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"osandov@fb.com" <osandov@fb.com>,
"john.garry@huawei.com" <john.garry@huawei.com>,
"loberman@redhat.com" <loberman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI: don't get target/host busy_count in scsi_mq_get_budget()
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 19:45:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1509997522.2409.58.camel@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adb7f6bd-bf0d-8176-808b-32a84ac4273a@kernel.dk>
On Sat, 2017-11-04 at 08:19 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/03/2017 07:55 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > It is very expensive to atomic_inc/atomic_dec the host wide counter of
> > host->busy_count, and it should have been avoided via blk-mq's mechanism
> > of getting driver tag, which uses the more efficient way of sbitmap queue.
> >
> > Also we don't check atomic_read(&sdev->device_busy) in scsi_mq_get_budget()
> > and don't run queue if the counter becomes zero, so IO hang may be caused
> > if all requests are completed just before the current SCSI device
> > is added to shost->starved_list.
>
> This looks like an improvement. I have added it for 4.15.
>
> Bart, does this fix your hang?
No, it doesn't. After I had reduced starget->can_queue in the SRP initiator I
ran into the following hang while running the srp-test software:
sysrq: SysRq : Show Blocked State
task PC stack pid father
systemd-udevd D 0 19882 467 0x80000106
Call Trace:
__schedule+0x2fa/0xbb0
schedule+0x36/0x90
io_schedule+0x16/0x40
__lock_page+0x10a/0x140
truncate_inode_pages_range+0x4ff/0x800
truncate_inode_pages+0x15/0x20
kill_bdev+0x35/0x40
__blkdev_put+0x6d/0x1f0
blkdev_put+0x4e/0x130
blkdev_close+0x25/0x30
__fput+0xed/0x1f0
____fput+0xe/0x10
task_work_run+0x8b/0xc0
do_exit+0x38d/0xc70
do_group_exit+0x50/0xd0
get_signal+0x2ad/0x8c0
do_signal+0x28/0x680
exit_to_usermode_loop+0x5a/0xa0
do_syscall_64+0x12e/0x170
entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
The SRP initiator driver was modified as follows for this test:
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
index a6664467651e..9d24a871cc2e 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
@@ -2835,6 +2839,13 @@ static int srp_reset_host(struct scsi_cmnd *scmnd)
return srp_reconnect_rport(target->rport) == 0 ? SUCCESS : FAILED;
}
+static int srp_target_alloc(struct scsi_target *starget)
+{
+ starget->can_queue = 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int srp_slave_alloc(struct scsi_device *sdev)
{
struct Scsi_Host *shost = sdev->host;
@@ -3039,6 +3050,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template srp_template = {
.module = THIS_MODULE,
.name = "InfiniBand SRP initiator",
.proc_name = DRV_NAME,
+ .target_alloc = srp_target_alloc,
.slave_alloc = srp_slave_alloc,
.slave_configure = srp_slave_configure,
.info = srp_target_info,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-06 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-04 1:55 [PATCH] SCSI: don't get target/host busy_count in scsi_mq_get_budget() Ming Lei
2017-11-04 14:19 ` Jens Axboe
2017-11-06 19:45 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2017-11-07 2:11 ` Ming Lei
2017-11-07 16:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-11-07 16:29 ` Jens Axboe
2017-11-07 17:10 ` Jens Axboe
2017-11-07 17:36 ` Jens Axboe
2017-11-07 22:06 ` Jens Axboe
2017-11-07 22:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-11-07 22:39 ` Jens Axboe
2017-11-08 0:50 ` Ming Lei
2017-11-08 1:03 ` Ming Lei
2017-11-08 3:01 ` Jens Axboe
2017-11-08 3:12 ` Ming Lei
2017-11-08 3:17 ` Jens Axboe
2017-11-08 6:20 ` Ming Lei
2017-11-08 15:59 ` Ming Lei
2017-11-08 18:19 ` Jens Axboe
2017-11-07 17:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-11-08 0:53 ` Ming Lei
2017-11-08 2:06 ` Ming Lei
2017-11-08 0:39 ` Ming Lei
2017-11-08 2:55 ` Jens Axboe
2017-11-08 2:58 ` Ming Lei
2017-11-08 3:06 ` Jens Axboe
2017-11-08 16:41 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-11-08 17:57 ` Jens Axboe
2017-11-08 18:22 ` Laurence Oberman
2017-11-08 18:28 ` Jens Axboe
2017-11-09 4:02 ` Ming Lei
2017-11-09 2:05 ` Ming Lei
2017-11-07 10:15 ` Ming Lei
2017-11-07 16:17 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-11-08 3:12 ` Jens Axboe
2017-11-06 18:04 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-11-07 2:19 ` Ming Lei
2017-11-07 3:53 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1509997522.2409.58.camel@wdc.com \
--to=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox