From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
To: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "zhaohongjiang@huawei.com" <zhaohongjiang@huawei.com>,
"jthumshirn@suse.de" <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"hare@suse.de" <hare@suse.de>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"yanaijie@huawei.com" <yanaijie@huawei.com>,
"jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"miaoxie@huawei.com" <miaoxie@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: fix race condition when removing target
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:47:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1511977672.2671.19.camel@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171129173904.GB20581@kroah.com>
On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 17:39 +0000, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 04:18:30PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > As the above patch description shows it can happen that the SCSI core calls
> > get_device() after the device reference count has reached zero and before
> > the memory for struct device is freed. Although the above patch looks fine
> > to me, would you consider it acceptable to modify get_device() such that it
> > uses kobject_get_unless_zero() instead of kobject_get()? I'm asking this
> > because that change would help to reduce the complexity of the already too
> > complicated SCSI core.
>
> Shouldn't there be a bus lock somewhere preventing this race? Having an
> open-coded put call isn't good, as you see here.
Hello Greg,
The get_device() call occurs with the SCSI host lock held. The SCSI host lock
serializes iteration over the sibling list by the get_device() caller and
removal of the SCSI host from the SCSI device sibling list by
scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext(). If you have a look at __scsi_remove_target()
then you will see that the host lock has to be released after a matching SCSI
target has been found and before scsi_remove_device() is called. The latter
function namely may sleep.
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-29 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-29 3:05 [PATCH] scsi: fix race condition when removing target Jason Yan
2017-11-29 7:41 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-11-29 16:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-11-29 16:20 ` hch
2017-11-29 17:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-11-30 1:18 ` Jason Yan
2017-11-30 16:08 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-11-30 16:40 ` gregkh
2017-11-30 23:56 ` James Bottomley
2017-12-01 1:12 ` Finn Thain
2017-12-01 8:40 ` Jason Yan
2017-12-01 14:41 ` Ewan D. Milne
2017-12-01 15:35 ` James Bottomley
2017-12-05 12:37 ` Jason Yan
2017-12-05 15:37 ` James Bottomley
2017-12-06 0:41 ` Jason Yan
2017-12-06 2:07 ` James Bottomley
2017-12-06 2:43 ` Jason Yan
2017-11-29 17:39 ` gregkh
2017-11-29 18:49 ` Ewan D. Milne
2017-11-29 19:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-11-29 19:20 ` Ewan D. Milne
2017-11-29 19:50 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-11-29 17:39 ` gregkh
2017-11-29 17:47 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2017-11-29 16:31 ` James Bottomley
2017-11-29 16:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-29 16:47 ` James Bottomley
2017-11-29 19:05 ` Ewan D. Milne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1511977672.2671.19.camel@wdc.com \
--to=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=miaoxie@huawei.com \
--cc=yanaijie@huawei.com \
--cc=zhaohongjiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).