public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, Linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Two blk-mq related topics
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 12:56:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1517259390.3969.41.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180129154455.GB17176@ming.t460p>

On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 23:46 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
[...]
> 2. When to enable SCSI_MQ at default again?

I'm not sure there's much to discuss ... I think the basic answer is as
soon as Christoph wants to try it again.

> SCSI_MQ is enabled on V3.17 firstly, but disabled at default. In
> V4.13-rc1, it is enabled at default, but later the patch is reverted
> in V4.13-rc7, and becomes disabled at default too.
> 
> Now both the original reported PM issue(actually SCSI quiesce) and
> the sequential IO performance issue have been addressed.

Is the blocker bug just not closed because no-one thought to do it:

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=178381

(we have confirmed that this issue is now fixed with the original
reporter?)

And did the Huawei guy (Jonathan Cameron) confirm his performance issue
was fixed (I don't think I saw email that he did)?

James

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-29 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-29 15:46 [LSF/MM TOPIC] Two blk-mq related topics Ming Lei
2018-01-29 20:40 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-30  1:27   ` Ming Lei
2018-01-29 20:56 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2018-01-29 21:00   ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-29 23:46     ` James Bottomley
2018-01-30  1:47       ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-30 10:08     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-01-30 10:50       ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-30  1:24   ` Ming Lei
2018-01-30  8:33     ` Martin Steigerwald
2018-01-30 10:33     ` John Garry
2018-02-07 10:55       ` John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1517259390.3969.41.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=Linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox