From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 011.lax.mailroute.net (011.lax.mailroute.net [199.89.1.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8CFC2E8897 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2026 13:00:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772802045; cv=none; b=PMqne82mf/LfTQI7qk/+1Iuh34Rck346XSpZh82SxL4ysuMf61IecmgvLtGmjIQlzUijZ+0bRtChhgYCS4wz+X5a9KDNtyU+gxg8p+Guz0YhLoGX0VjPl3+y3EE4dSrf0gw918Vry2BcicSVdro/XYoFgSO6Fc6uzXSmJShmF0U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772802045; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FTWCEgxsIFL5rqSjlUXUxvNiQA8jhw8NCnxQBv6Nrm8=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=EFRCPeSPCJewon1XoFGf+zyHpZQQosdeGZT5r0hn5WJX5fbZgGpuVUIhfIWz5cQfajPZS1LEDbTwQoudsde4peirmGJLW61IBPN8ZQUHS3mE6jfFStmHikMtm6BJDMDhccX1Ptf5+FI7kdhpaOtu5qvT8apmIMCwi0hFfAW0fto= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=KCYNTC3o; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="KCYNTC3o" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 011.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4fS63020qLz1XLyYZ; Fri, 6 Mar 2026 13:00:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1772802041; x=1775394042; bh=FTWCEgxsIFL5rqSjlUXUxvNi QA8jhw8NCnxQBv6Nrm8=; b=KCYNTC3oOpo3LfrZl8LDTNpFmFn1gdXlqEEkMen7 NOYp0UeAF1YQ/zAdiYAJVNkcvKO6SdaBwjTLP2SI3Ssnp9FwuGtfw82jXQqKiyJE ZCU9Ph/chfFG+baX+zXyUMtW+k4473comh19gedq+CKZ6bC3uoAa4wMbGCvHcuP4 wVvsTl7Bfwp6f4FG/ES6nVAGLK/l1gI8w1ndCKmhh7seMiISIyKNuNJxG3pVbbQm yAnUAOEUvHI/Yu9+bzq1vvI68InRUWcv7bkPZaCYKjcGUou+sUGyLkDNRZeFo1/X LW1giSCa+EWIU85r2flGDr/en6ePsbFV77n5vf073Ji1WQ== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 011.lax.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (011.lax [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id 58NB20eqm7M0; Fri, 6 Mar 2026 13:00:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.132.187] (unknown [12.150.89.26]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 011.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4fS62v39Dyz1XM0p2; Fri, 6 Mar 2026 13:00:38 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <15409eb0-53c7-4d15-a29e-653b3415f4df@acm.org> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 07:00:37 -0600 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 11/23] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove undocumented downstream reset cruft To: Nicolas Frattaroli , "martin.petersen@oracle.com" , =?UTF-8?B?UGV0ZXIgV2FuZyAo546L5L+h5Y+LKQ==?= Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "kernel@collabora.com" References: <20260304-mt8196-ufs-v8-0-5b0eac23314f@collabora.com> <3472277.mvXUDI8C0e@workhorse> <2a68eb32987c21b6a48547ce044ee38d1eb01fa5.camel@mediatek.com> <4282403.mvXUDI8C0e@workhorse> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <4282403.mvXUDI8C0e@workhorse> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 3/6/26 6:53 AM, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote: > And I thought putting bindings through bindings review was a basic > requirement, but apparently not for you when you can subvert the > kernel's review process and push your downstream crap into mainline > willy-nilly. Please keep it professional and focus on the reported issue rather than attacking the person who reported the issue. Thanks, Bart.