From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@ts.fujitsu.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] scsi: target: tcmu: running 32bit userspace on 64bit kernel
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 09:52:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1593535964.4124.2.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <364c13da-6d4f-c28b-36b3-082db8c3de58@ts.fujitsu.com>
On Tue, 2020-06-30 at 18:49 +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When using tcmu it might happen, that userspace application cannot be
> built as 64 bit program even on a 64 bit host due to existing 32 bit
> libraries that must be used, e.g. for compression, encryption,
> deduplication, ...
>
> Currently this only works with manual changes in userspace include
> file target_core_user.h due to a missing padding field in
> struct tcmu_cmd_entry.
>
> Here are field offsets printed by a small program on a 64 bit host,
> compiled as 64 bit program and as 32 bit:
>
> Devel:~ # gcc -o print_offsets print_offsets.c
> Devel:~ # ./print_offsets
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.hdr.len_op = 0000
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.hdr.cmd_id = 0004
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.hdr.kflags = 0006
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.hdr.uflags = 0007
>
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.req.iov_cnt = 0008
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.req.iov_bidi_cnt = 000c
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.req.iov_dif_cnt = 0010
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.req.cdb_off = 0018
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.req.iov[0] = 0030
>
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.rsp.scsi_status = 0008
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.rsp.read_len = 000c
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.rsp.sense_buffer[0] = 0010
>
> Size of struct tcmu_cmd_entry = 0070
>
>
> Devel:~ # gcc -m32 -o print_offsets print_offsets.c
> Devel:~ # ./print_offsets
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.hdr.len_op = 0000
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.hdr.cmd_id = 0004
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.hdr.kflags = 0006
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.hdr.uflags = 0007
>
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.req.iov_cnt = 0008
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.req.iov_bidi_cnt = 000c
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.req.iov_dif_cnt = 0010
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.req.cdb_off = 0014
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.req.iov[0] = 002c
>
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.rsp.scsi_status = 0008
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.rsp.read_len = 000c
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.rsp.sense_buffer[0] = 0010
>
> Size of struct tcmu_cmd_entry = 0070
>
>
> The offset of the fields req.cdb_off and req.iov differ for 64-bit
> and 32-bit compilation.
>
> That means:
> - 64-bit application on 64-bit host works well
> - 32-bit application on 32-bit host works well
> - 32-bit application on 64-bit host fails.
>
> Unfortunately I don't see a way to fix this problem such, that
> 32-bit application runs fine on 32-bit and 64-bit host without
> breaking compatibility.
>
> So I'm wondering whether the following change would be a viable
> solution:
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/target_core_user.h
> b/include/uapi/linux/target_core_user.h
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/target_core_user.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/target_core_user.h
> @@ -114,6 +114,9 @@ struct tcmu_cmd_entry {
> __u32 iov_cnt;
> __u32 iov_bidi_cnt;
> __u32 iov_dif_cnt;
> +#ifdef APPL32BIT_ON_KERNEL64BIT
> + __u32 __pad9;
> +#endif
> __u64 cdb_off;
> __u64 __pad1;
> __u64 __pad2;
>
>
> Using this change we can do:
>
> Devel:~ # gcc -m32 -DAPPL32BIT_ON_KERNEL64BIT -o print_offsets
> print_offsets.c
> Devel:~ # ./print_offsets
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.hdr.len_op = 0000
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.hdr.cmd_id = 0004
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.hdr.kflags = 0006
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.hdr.uflags = 0007
>
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.req.iov_cnt = 0008
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.req.iov_bidi_cnt = 000c
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.req.iov_dif_cnt = 0010
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.req.cdb_off = 0018
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.req.iov[0] = 0030
>
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.rsp.scsi_status = 0008
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.rsp.read_len = 000c
> Offset of tcmu_cmd_entry.rsp.sense_buffer[0] = 0010
>
> Size of struct tcmu_cmd_entry = 0070
>
>
> So we can compile a 32-bit application that works on 64-bit kernel
> without need to manipulate the include file prepared by the kernel.
>
> What do you think? Do you know a better solution?
Can you not use something similar to the compat_ioctl mechanism? the
job of the compat layer is to re-layout the input and output structures
to impedance match between 32 and 64 bit.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-30 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-30 16:49 [RFC] scsi: target: tcmu: running 32bit userspace on 64bit kernel Bodo Stroesser
2020-06-30 16:52 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2020-06-30 17:17 ` Bodo Stroesser
2020-06-30 17:27 ` James Bottomley
2020-06-30 18:00 ` Bodo Stroesser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1593535964.4124.2.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=bstroesser@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox