From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix aic7xxx del_timer_sync() deadlock Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 12:42:30 -0700 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <162922704.1078083749@aslan.btc.adaptec.com> References: <1077906383.2157.98.camel@mulgrave> <3462370000.1077909838@aslan.btc.adaptec.com> <403FFF86.90302@pobox.com> <20040228092512.GD923@suse.de> <4041292C.3090700@pobox.com> <20040229091350.GC3149@suse.de> <137982704.1078081053@aslan.btc.adaptec.com> <404236C1.5000001@pobox.com> <156412704.1078082931@aslan.btc.adaptec.com> <40423F7B.4020102@pobox.com> Reply-To: "Justin T. Gibbs" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from magic.adaptec.com ([216.52.22.17]:58527 "EHLO magic.adaptec.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262122AbUB2Tmh (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Feb 2004 14:42:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: <40423F7B.4020102@pobox.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Jens Axboe , James Bottomley , SCSI Mailing List , Andrew Morton >> Exactly. The block layer shouldn't be involved in this at all. In the >> particular case I was talking about, busy or queue full with no I/O pending, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Agreed for busy. > > But queue full? Some SCSI devices send Queue Full instead of Busy in the case of a "busy" condition with no I/O pending. -- Justin