From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Arun Easi <arun.easi@cavium.com>,
Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"hare@suse.de" <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: scsi-mq - tag# and can_queue, performance.
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 10:47:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19fb1bcb-6207-d63b-c326-a10991848577@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1704030931320.727@mvluser05.qlc.com>
On 04/03/2017 10:41 AM, Arun Easi wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Apr 2017, 8:20am, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2017-04-03 at 09:29 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>> On 04/03/2017 08:37 AM, Arun Easi wrote:
>>>> If the above is true, then for a LLD to get tag# within it's max-tasks
>>>> range, it has to report max-tasks / number-of-hw-queues in can_queue, and
>>>> in the I/O path, use the tag and hwq# to arrive at a index# to use. This,
>>>> though, leads to a poor use of tag resources -- queue reaching it's
>>>> capacity while LLD can still take it.
>>>
>>> Shared tag sets continue to dog the block-mq on 'legacy' (ie non-NVMe)
>>> HBAs. ATM the only 'real' solution to this problem is indeed have a
>>> static split of the entire tag space by the number of hardware queues.
>>> With the mentioned tag-starvation problem.
>>
>> Hello Arun and Hannes,
>>
>> Apparently the current blk_mq_alloc_tag_set() implementation is well suited
>> for drivers like NVMe and ib_srp but not for traditional SCSI HBA drivers.
>> How about adding a BLK_MQ_F_* flag that tells __blk_mq_alloc_rq_maps() to
>> allocate a single set of tags for all hardware queues and also to add a flag
>> to struct scsi_host_template such that SCSI LLDs can enable this behavior?
>>
>
> Hi Bart,
>
> This would certainly be beneficial in my case. Moreover, it certainly
> makes sense to move the logic up where multiple drivers can leverage.
>
> Perhaps, use percpu_ida* interfaces to do that, but I think I read
> somewhere that, it is not efficient (enough?) and is the reason to go the
> current way for block tags.
You don't have to change the underlying tag generation to solve this
problem, Bart already pretty much outlined a fix that would work.
percpu_ida works fine if you never use more than roughly half the
available space, it's a poor fit for request tags where we want to
retain good behavior and scaling at or near tag exhaustion. That's why
blk-mq ended up rolling its own, which is now generically available as
lib/sbitmap.c.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-03 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-03 6:37 scsi-mq - tag# and can_queue, performance Arun Easi
2017-04-03 7:29 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-04-03 15:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-03 16:41 ` Arun Easi
2017-04-03 16:47 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2017-04-03 16:51 ` Arun Easi
2017-04-03 16:31 ` Arun Easi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19fb1bcb-6207-d63b-c326-a10991848577@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com \
--cc=arun.easi@cavium.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox