From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Report the residual of a write
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 08:45:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1dac66aa-a4e6-4c79-a914-d5d2699c392f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260927052650.567035-18-cassel@kernel.org>
On 2026/09/27 7:26, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> A write whose data buffer is larger than its transfer length leaves a
> residual that the initiator is entitled to be told about. resp_read_dt0()
> and resp_write_tape() report it, but the write paths for a disk do not,
> so such a write completes with GOOD status and a residual of zero while
> a READ of the same length into the same buffer reports it correctly.
I am not convinced this is correct. resid (residual count) is supposed to
indicate the amount of data that was *not* transferred. So if the buffer size is
larger that the command cdb transfer count, all data can be transferred and
resid should be 0. Which would mean that for this case, the write processing is
correct but the read side is not.
The SBC and SPC specs are very silent about this though, I do not think that the
resid is actually standardized. And I do not see a clear definition for it in
the documentation/code comments.
>
> Report it in resp_write_dt0(), resp_write_scat() and resp_atomic_write().
>
> resp_write_scat() differs twice over. Its data-out buffer also holds the
> parameter list header and the LBA range descriptors, so what the command
> consumed is sg_off rather than the bytes that the last range
> transferred; and sg_off counts what was asked for rather than what was
> transferred, so it can exceed the buffer and needs a guard. A command
> with no LBA range descriptors or a buffer transfer length of zero
> transfers nothing, so the whole buffer is residual. An error, real or
> injected, can end the command after some ranges have been written, so
> the residual is reported on every exit once the parameter list has been
> fetched.
>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> ---
> Tested with:
>
> modprobe scsi_debug zbc=managed sector_size=512 physblk_exp=3 \
> zone_size_mb=8 dev_size_mb=128 zone_nr_conv=2
>
> An eight logical block WRITE(16) with a 5000 byte buffer reports
> resid=904, having transferred 4096. A READ(16) of the same length into
> the same buffer reported that before this patch and the WRITE reported
> 0. A buffer of exactly 4096 bytes reports 0, as does a 512 byte buffer,
> which is consumed in its entirety. WRITE ATOMIC (16) behaves like the
> WRITE, on a device that is not zoned.
>
> WRITE SCATTERED (16) with one LBA range descriptor of eight blocks and a
> 5632 byte buffer reports resid=1024, having consumed 512 bytes of
> parameter list and 4096 bytes of data. The same command with a 1024 byte
> buffer completes and reports resid=0: sg_off reaches 4608, past the end
> of the buffer, and without the guard the residual would have been
> reported as 4294963712.
>
> Changes since v8: the residual is also reported when a later range
> fails. A WRITE SCATTERED (16) whose second range is out of range now
> reports resid=5120 of its 9728 byte buffer, where v8 reported 0.
> ---
> drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> index b64ae3ad300d..0c66a3118ee8 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> @@ -5162,6 +5162,8 @@ static int resp_write_dt0(struct scsi_cmnd *scp, struct sdebug_dev_info *devip)
> "%s: write: cdb indicated=%u, IO sent=%d bytes\n",
> my_name, num * sdebug_sector_size, ret);
>
> + scsi_set_resid(scp, scsi_bufflen(scp) - ret);
> +
> if (unlikely((sdebug_opts & SDEBUG_OPT_RECOV_DIF_DIX) &&
> atomic_read(&sdeb_inject_pending))) {
> if (sdebug_opts & SDEBUG_OPT_RECOVERED_ERR) {
> @@ -5233,8 +5235,10 @@ static int resp_write_scat(struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
> "Unprotected WR to DIF device\n");
> }
> }
> - if ((num_lrd == 0) || (bt_len == 0))
> + if (num_lrd == 0 || bt_len == 0) {
> + scsi_set_resid(scp, scsi_bufflen(scp));
> return 0; /* T10 says these do-nothings are not errors */
> + }
> if (lbdof == 0) {
> if (sdebug_verbose)
> sdev_printk(KERN_INFO, scp->device,
> @@ -5327,6 +5331,8 @@ static int resp_write_scat(struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
>
> if (unlikely((sdebug_opts & SDEBUG_OPT_RECOV_DIF_DIX) &&
> atomic_read(&sdeb_inject_pending))) {
> + /* This range has been written */
> + sg_off += num_by;
> if (sdebug_opts & SDEBUG_OPT_RECOVERED_ERR) {
> mk_sense_buffer(scp, RECOVERED_ERROR,
> FAILURE_PREDICTION_THRESHOLD_EXCEEDED);
> @@ -5352,6 +5358,13 @@ static int resp_write_scat(struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
> }
> ret = 0;
> err_out_unlock:
> + /*
> + * sg_off counts what the command asked for, which can exceed the
> + * buffer: lbdof is not validated against it, and a range is counted
> + * in full even if do_device_access() copied less.
> + */
> + if (scsi_bufflen(scp) > sg_off)
> + scsi_set_resid(scp, scsi_bufflen(scp) - sg_off);
> sdeb_meta_write_unlock(sip);
> err_out:
> kfree(lrdp);
> @@ -6206,6 +6219,8 @@ static int resp_atomic_write(struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
> return DID_ERROR << 16;
> if (unlikely(ret != len * sdebug_sector_size))
> return DID_ERROR << 16;
> +
> + scsi_set_resid(scp, scsi_bufflen(scp) - ret);
> return 0;
> }
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-27 5:26 [PATCH v9 00/11] scsi: scsi_debug: fix zoned write validation Niklas Cassel
2026-09-27 5:26 ` [PATCH v9 01/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Refuse a zoned device with a non-zero lowest aligned LBA Niklas Cassel
2026-09-27 5:26 ` [PATCH v9 02/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Make atomic writes and ZBC emulation mutually exclusive Niklas Cassel
2026-09-27 5:26 ` [PATCH v9 03/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Take the zone metadata lock before the data lock Niklas Cassel
2026-09-27 5:26 ` [PATCH v9 04/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Evaluate scsi_debug_lbp() only once Niklas Cassel
2026-09-27 5:26 ` [PATCH v9 05/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Report the residual of a write Niklas Cassel
2026-09-27 5:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-27 7:01 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-28 6:45 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2026-09-28 7:15 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-28 7:51 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-28 8:15 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-27 5:26 ` [PATCH v9 06/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Enforce physical block alignment of zoned writes Niklas Cassel
2026-09-27 5:26 ` [PATCH v9 07/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Do not write a partial physical block to a zoned device Niklas Cassel
2026-09-27 5:26 ` [PATCH v9 08/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Advance the write pointer over the data written Niklas Cassel
2026-09-27 5:27 ` [PATCH v9 09/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Refuse a short WRITE ATOMIC (16) before writing it Niklas Cassel
2026-09-27 5:27 ` [PATCH v9 10/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Map the region written by WRITE ATOMIC (16) Niklas Cassel
2026-09-27 5:27 ` [PATCH v9 11/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Validate the access parameters of " Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1dac66aa-a4e6-4c79-a914-d5d2699c392f@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=john.garry@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox