From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7ECECA9EA0 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 22:10:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 800C921D7B for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 22:10:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="p5OsG6fm" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726283AbfJYWKT (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 18:10:19 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com ([209.85.128.68]:35714 "EHLO mail-wm1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725801AbfJYWKS (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 18:10:18 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id v6so3514683wmj.0 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:10:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zivFqQLZdgYBkxIweW0dcWWWDLblvf44uV5tDQXfePY=; b=p5OsG6fmuM7A3kOFGpWbZ4Q19Zld+oFaZndtt6YQS2W+SvqUZFn9N3ugoCtY+melel +LAhViBn8z5rt3pal3ZD+6Wqtj45tgZi79eicjnJ9ih9prrtYxI4zWatoW9Fo7X2cGvW 6DAFd0nmCFmCfCnBcpHxliknpJfpnAchitUcAh8vN1fQ29ORs4U3Mut4iKb/zBbSsEUL U/wpz7rCYdk+IcQ5HwN+ZCRBbnqiMQW6SJl3AygUnOZyxipc9rypI6eyK9DvUXD0wfNm 84OAvTMbG5F5r2w9fFRRKS+eWw0hjcTSRpb6Zw68VJ1E21PJYDqerCcvcRMqyvOV6e3t 9udA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zivFqQLZdgYBkxIweW0dcWWWDLblvf44uV5tDQXfePY=; b=arfQXC9J17xb0HL8gVsmOgfgU6tv8sfcK5mFlJJUGN/jlMhOy1+4lVW2bDo8w2LtFh 6/UwiINzlA6J/L7u8mT0Ab5pytcO25h+jHHyjNetIMCDhYQJgKq7zni7dEcpQRxlCRzN +V7KOr1S8b80f8IxjaNAlgVSuZfKidsJBcK8dOFShvG3PQG0f11u26Zf3TScEpzvKVcs yqNQduWWkEJI7JpFFeruc+wycI7QgYf+x0WSzHX+or3ZAKhpUbfrfW+exshZ060hPDbX yCJX2aeitvndjHF/ywhlZDJqBqTFfWkcBW5J9+jTtOO6LT6Fl6TomXSBTaswm1S5GI9w 5saA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUalSrZWHcCHZB1SBJEww3dtAD5QEKKOBzW1c4aro1svJyfbkxM 9ZvqM/a53UY0xxeQhdoSZlw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxDVM29liH0JtsWe/2bm2ZlOqXuDcdB5g99OpQMzz/Wt+Xz7OnEubPYFEf2OvmnsM6SeLIDXA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cc0c:: with SMTP id f12mr5271681wmh.40.1572041416098; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:10:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.69.45.46] ([192.19.223.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l11sm2994173wmh.34.2019.10.25.15.10.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:10:15 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/32] elx: libefc_sli: Data structures and defines for mbox commands To: Steffen Maier , Daniel Wagner Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Ram Vegesna References: <20191023215557.12581-1-jsmart2021@gmail.com> <20191023215557.12581-4-jsmart2021@gmail.com> <20191025111944.hdgfnslk57njngfi@beryllium.lan> From: James Smart Message-ID: <1dde5a35-0557-d6db-2779-616d7097230b@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:10:12 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 10/25/2019 5:20 AM, Steffen Maier wrote: > Protect the macro argument in the expansion with parentheses to prevent > unintended operator precedence during evaluation? > As with (b) of SLI_ROUND_PAGE(b) above. > > (((val) &  ... )) yep, agree. Thanks -- james