From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [RFC] Persistent naming of scsi devices Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 19:01:03 +0100 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20020408190103.A11421@infradead.org> References: <20020408091844.L7333@austin.ibm.com> <20020408160445.A25213@infradead.org> <16udIR-0pQ920C@fmrl04.sul.t-online.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16udIR-0pQ920C@fmrl04.sul.t-online.com>; from oliver@neukum.org on Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 07:51:59PM +0200 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Oliver Neukum Cc: Christoph Hellwig , sullivan , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 07:51:59PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > On Monday 08 April 2002 17:04, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:18:44AM -0600, sullivan wrote: > > > I would welcome any thoughts, comments, or suggestions. > > > > What is the rationale for doing this? I think we should rather get people > > to actually use the UUID= option to mount.. > > UUID cannot solve the problem. It identifies filesystems. Or volumes..