From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove SCSI_BH Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 12:14:36 +0100 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20020617121436.R9435@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <20020616192253.Q9435@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20020616.222201.105585133.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020616.222201.105585133.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 10:22:01PM -0700 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "David S. Miller" Cc: willy@debian.org, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 10:22:01PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Matthew Wilcox > Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 19:22:53 +0100 > > Hi, Linus. This patch switches SCSI from a bottom half to a tasklet. > It's been reviewed, tested & approved by Andrew Morton, James Bottomley & > Doug Gilbert. Please apply. > > I always wanted to make this a per-cpu SOFTIRQ, there is no reason > it can't be and it's important enough to deserve to be one. I agree that it probably should become a softirq. However, in its current state, I'm not sure it would gain any advantage from becoming a softirq. I think it would take someone with far more understanding of the SCSI layer than I have to do this work properly. My current motivation is to eradicate bottom halves rather than to improve scsi. If someone's maintaining a TODO list for the scsi subsystem, please include: * Convert scsi_bottom_half_handler to a softirq. as one of the entries. -- Revolutions do not require corporate support.