From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>,
Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>,
Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>,
Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>,
Linux kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux SCSI list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] /proc/scsi/map
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 14:52:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200206201852.g5KIqoJ06342@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> of "Thu, 20 Jun 2002 11:36:25 PDT." <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206201133180.8225-100000@home.transmeta.com>
torvalds@transmeta.com said:
> SCSI people, how does that patch look to you? Apparently it does
> everything the scsimap thing does, in a way that is certainly
> acceptable to me.
It looks OK to me. It doesn't quite do everything you want in terms of doing
your bus1/id2/lun0 piece, but it's a good start.
We should probably have some more discussion about the layout of the device
tree, particularly if it's going to be consistent with other devices like ide
discs and cds.
I'd like to see the "name" field become mutable from user level somehow just
so we can fix the enterprise name on broken devices without having to have a
huge kernel exception table, but that's my only current concern.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-20 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200206200711.RAA10165@thucydides.inspired.net.au>
2002-06-20 15:13 ` [PATCH] /proc/scsi/map Linus Torvalds
2002-06-20 15:36 ` Dave Jones
2002-06-20 17:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-20 16:55 ` Andries Brouwer
2002-06-20 19:18 ` Patrick Mochel
[not found] ` <20020620165553.GA16897@win.tue.nl>
2002-06-20 17:52 ` Patrick Mansfield
2002-06-20 18:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-20 18:52 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2002-06-20 19:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-20 16:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-06-21 0:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-20 16:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-06-20 20:06 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-22 18:27 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-20 18:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-20 22:59 ` Martin Schwenke
2002-06-20 23:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-22 18:25 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-26 16:03 ` Ihno Krumreich
2002-06-20 19:55 ` Greg KH
2002-06-21 6:28 ` Mike Touloumtzis
2002-06-22 17:24 David Brownell
2002-06-22 17:48 ` Roman Zippel
2002-06-22 20:11 ` Douglas Gilbert
2002-06-22 20:57 ` Roman Zippel
2002-06-22 18:18 ` Nick Bellinger
2002-06-24 1:50 ` David Brownell
2002-06-25 16:46 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-06-25 16:33 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-06-25 17:49 ` David Brownell
2002-06-26 23:39 ` Nick Bellinger
2002-07-03 0:59 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] <20020621092943.D1243@austin.ibm.com>
2002-06-21 16:17 ` Patrick Mochel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-20 23:59 Grover, Andrew
[not found] <20020620112543.GD26376@gum01m.etpnet.phys.tue.nl>
2002-06-20 15:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-20 16:30 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-20 16:58 ` James Bottomley
2002-06-20 18:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-20 20:55 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-20 21:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-20 21:36 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-20 20:12 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-06-20 22:29 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-22 18:42 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-21 21:33 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-22 4:38 ` Nick Bellinger
2002-06-22 19:41 ` Douglas Gilbert
2002-06-22 19:11 ` Nick Bellinger
2002-06-25 18:13 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-06-25 16:05 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-06-25 16:57 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-25 18:58 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-07-03 1:01 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-20 18:32 ` Kurt Garloff
2002-06-20 18:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-21 9:07 ` Kurt Garloff
2002-06-20 0:44 Kurt Garloff
2002-06-20 5:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-20 7:09 ` Martin Schwenke
2002-06-20 11:25 ` Kurt Garloff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200206201852.g5KIqoJ06342@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=aebr@win.tue.nl \
--cc=garloff@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin@meltin.net \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
--cc=patmans@us.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox