From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] 2.4 SCSI error handling fixes
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 19:18:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020912191824.D4739@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
I've been chasing a few SCSI problems today, and here's 4 patches to
address the issues I found. These patches are against 2.4.19.
My main aim here was to solve the bad behaviour with a medium error.
Some problems were found in my HBA driver, but some were found in
the error handling code.
Problems found were:
a) retrying a command with stale or invalid command information.
(Patches 1 and 2)
b) reporting the wrong command on IO error.
(Patch 3)
c) drives behaving badly in error condition, reporting success without
data transfer.
(Patch 4)
Results of investigation into these issues can be found at in my lkml
messages at:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103184937214222&w=2
Patch 4 is the one I'm least happy about; we shouldn't unconditionally
set the FUA bit in READ10 commands. It seems that we need to set this
bit only after receiving an error, and only when we try to read the
remaining blocks which we believe are good.
Patch 4: set FUA bit for READ10/WRITE10 commands.
*** NOTE *** This needs a better solution. Setting the
FUA bit bypasses the drives cache altogether. You should
read the message at the URL above *before* commenting for
a detailed explaination of the problem, and why I've had
to make this change.
--- orig/drivers/scsi/sd.c Mon Aug 5 13:31:25 2002
+++ linux/drivers/scsi/sd.c Thu Sep 12 17:55:55 2002
@@ -399,6 +399,7 @@
this_count = 0xffff;
SCpnt->cmnd[0] += READ_10 - READ_6;
+ SCpnt->cmnd[1] |= 1 << 3; /* Set FUA --rmk */
SCpnt->cmnd[2] = (unsigned char) (block >> 24) & 0xff;
SCpnt->cmnd[3] = (unsigned char) (block >> 16) & 0xff;
SCpnt->cmnd[4] = (unsigned char) (block >> 8) & 0xff;
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
next reply other threads:[~2002-09-12 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-12 18:18 Russell King [this message]
2002-09-23 15:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] 2.4 SCSI error handling fixes James Bottomley
2002-09-23 18:57 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020912191824.D4739@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox