From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH] first cut at fixing unable to requeue with no outstanding commands Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 20:38:49 -0400 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <200210010038.g910cnB31623@localhost.localdomain> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: (from root@localhost) by pogo.mtv1.steeleye.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA23910 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 17:38:53 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (sshppp-200.mtv1.steeleye.com [172.16.1.200]) by pogo.mtv1.steeleye.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA23821 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 17:38:51 -0700 Received: from mulgrave (jejb@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/linuxconf) with ESMTP id g910cnB31623 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 20:38:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message from Mike Anderson of "Mon, 30 Sep 2002 16:28:11 PDT." <20020930232811.GA1372@beaverton.ibm.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org andmike@us.ibm.com said: > Are we guaranteed that blk_run_queues will be called for all types of > I/O? Pretty much, it looks like. It's mainly triggered by I/O stuff in fs, including the buffer functions, so I think the assumption that we will be called eventually is good. James