From: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Setting queue depths in the scsi mid layer, an intro
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 21:28:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021015012809.GG1274@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021014181512.A7237@eng2.beaverton.ibm.com>
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 06:15:12PM -0700, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> Doug -
>
> Finally looking at and using the new queue depth code in 2.5.42.
>
> Why are there two kmalloc()'s in scsi.c scsi_build_commandblocks()?
>
> They both use the same flags, including GFP_ATOMIC:
>
> void scsi_build_commandblocks(Scsi_Device * SDpnt)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> Scsi_Cmnd *SCpnt;
>
> if (SDpnt->queue_depth != 0)
> return;
>
> SCpnt = (Scsi_Cmnd *) kmalloc(sizeof(Scsi_Cmnd), GFP_ATOMIC |
> (SDpnt->host->unchecked_isa_dma ? GFP_DMA : 0));
> if (NULL == SCpnt) {
> /*
> * Since we don't currently have *any* command blocks on this
> * device, go ahead and try an atomic allocation...
> */
> SCpnt = (Scsi_Cmnd *) kmalloc(sizeof(Scsi_Cmnd), GFP_ATOMIC |
> (SDpnt->host->unchecked_isa_dma ? GFP_DMA : 0));
> if (NULL == SCpnt)
> return; /* Oops, we aren't going anywhere for now */
> }
Oops. Oversight. It was from the time when I had the first allocation as
GFP_KERNEL and then an ATOMIC backup. I changed that because this is
called from non-sleep allowed contexts (tasklet/softirq) and therefore
must always use ATOMIC. So, it only needs one allocation attempt.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> 919-754-3700 x44233
Red Hat, Inc.
1801 Varsity Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27606
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-15 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-11 2:46 Setting queue depths in the scsi mid layer, an intro Doug Ledford
2002-10-11 10:34 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-11 10:39 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-11 12:47 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-11 12:49 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-11 13:22 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-15 1:15 ` Patrick Mansfield
2002-10-15 1:28 ` Doug Ledford [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021015012809.GG1274@redhat.com \
--to=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).