From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Merritt Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI hotplug support Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:22:54 -0400 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20021015142254.09a5770f.Scsi@PragmaSoft.com> References: <200210142107.g9EL7IX04354@localhost.localdomain> <200210150019.53689.oliver@neukum.name> <20021015002252.GE1274@redhat.com> <200210150953.29905.oliver@neukum.name> <20021015143533.GA4288@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20021015143533.GA4288@redhat.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Doug Ledford Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:35:33 -0400 Doug Ledford wrote: > Now, please, someone tell me why everyone is whining about user space > doing so little to accomplish what the much larger patch that was ... Not *everyone* is whining about funnelling the scsi attachments back through user space :) I *much* prefer this approach as it makes it easier for users to install extra/different processing if necessary. In some sense, this is similar to my previous objections about the scsi drivers insisting on automatically reading the partition tables whenever they (think) they have encountered a scsi block device.