linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexy Khrabrov <braver@pobox.com>
To: Alexy Khrabrov <braver@pobox.com>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Wide negotiation fails with 80->68 LVD adapter?
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 22:00:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021022020058.GA11546@angle.setup.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021021163424.GE28914@redhat.com>

On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 12:34:24PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 01:14:47AM -0400, Alexy Khrabrov wrote:
> > 
> > Greetings -- did anybody try to connect a SCSI SCA
> > hard drive (with 80 pins) to an Adaptec 7899
> > Ultra160 with 65 pins?  Mine seems unable to spin
> > them at 160 Mbps.
> 
> [ snip long description ]
> 
> There is no difference between 68 pin drives and 80 pin drives as far as 
> the controller and the drive are concerned.  It's all just a physical 
> interconnect difference.  The problem you are describing is a 
> non-functional SCA->wide adapter.  I have yet to ever find a simple 
> wide<->SCA adapter that worked.  I've always had to have a real SCA 
> backplane before things worked properly.
> 

Thanks Doug.  Justin Gibbs concurred.  I am wondering whether the curse
is complete or anybody could recommend an adapter/enclosure?  I was
googling around and found things like CRU dataport racks, InClose 
external enclosures, and cremax racks, all having a 80<->68 model.
Now these things looks like more professional, and at least there's
a manufacturer as opposed to the anonymous Taiwan-made 80<->68 adapter.
Any experience with any of these stuffed with SCA drives connected to
a 68 pin Ultra160?...
-- 
Cheers,
Alexy Khrabrov :: www.setup.org :: Age Quod Agis

  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-22  2:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-21  5:14 Wide negotiation fails with 80->68 LVD adapter? Alexy Khrabrov
2002-10-21 16:34 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-22  2:00   ` Alexy Khrabrov [this message]
2002-10-22  5:13     ` Dan Jones
2002-10-22  3:24   ` Alexy Khrabrov
2002-10-22  5:30     ` Dan Jones
2002-10-22 16:16       ` Alexy Khrabrov
2002-10-22 17:03         ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-22 22:19           ` Alexy Khrabrov
2002-10-26 14:53             ` Alexy Khrabrov
2002-10-26 16:00               ` Doug Ledford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021022020058.GA11546@angle.setup.org \
    --to=braver@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).