From: Alexy Khrabrov <braver@pobox.com>
To: Alexy Khrabrov <braver@pobox.com>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Wide negotiation fails with 80->68 LVD adapter?
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 22:00:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021022020058.GA11546@angle.setup.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021021163424.GE28914@redhat.com>
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 12:34:24PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 01:14:47AM -0400, Alexy Khrabrov wrote:
> >
> > Greetings -- did anybody try to connect a SCSI SCA
> > hard drive (with 80 pins) to an Adaptec 7899
> > Ultra160 with 65 pins? Mine seems unable to spin
> > them at 160 Mbps.
>
> [ snip long description ]
>
> There is no difference between 68 pin drives and 80 pin drives as far as
> the controller and the drive are concerned. It's all just a physical
> interconnect difference. The problem you are describing is a
> non-functional SCA->wide adapter. I have yet to ever find a simple
> wide<->SCA adapter that worked. I've always had to have a real SCA
> backplane before things worked properly.
>
Thanks Doug. Justin Gibbs concurred. I am wondering whether the curse
is complete or anybody could recommend an adapter/enclosure? I was
googling around and found things like CRU dataport racks, InClose
external enclosures, and cremax racks, all having a 80<->68 model.
Now these things looks like more professional, and at least there's
a manufacturer as opposed to the anonymous Taiwan-made 80<->68 adapter.
Any experience with any of these stuffed with SCA drives connected to
a 68 pin Ultra160?...
--
Cheers,
Alexy Khrabrov :: www.setup.org :: Age Quod Agis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-22 2:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-21 5:14 Wide negotiation fails with 80->68 LVD adapter? Alexy Khrabrov
2002-10-21 16:34 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-22 2:00 ` Alexy Khrabrov [this message]
2002-10-22 5:13 ` Dan Jones
2002-10-22 3:24 ` Alexy Khrabrov
2002-10-22 5:30 ` Dan Jones
2002-10-22 16:16 ` Alexy Khrabrov
2002-10-22 17:03 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-22 22:19 ` Alexy Khrabrov
2002-10-26 14:53 ` Alexy Khrabrov
2002-10-26 16:00 ` Doug Ledford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021022020058.GA11546@angle.setup.org \
--to=braver@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).