From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: possible use-after-free in 2.5.44 scsi changes
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:13:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200210260013.g9Q0DP105454@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> of "Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:23:09 PDT." <200210252223.g9PMN9a17551@eng2.beaverton.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 645 bytes --]
pbadari@us.ibm.com said:
> I Just tried the patch. No Luck. I get same panic as before... I am
> using qla2x00src-v6.03.00b6 driver on qla2200 fc controllers.
Well, yours may be a qla bug.
However, I've tracked down my hang problem: If a command is pushed back into
the block queue as a REQ_SPECIAL using the blk_insert_request() API, it never
has REQ_CMD cleared. Eventually it comes back into scsi_request_fn() with
both REQ_CMD and REQ_SPECIAL set. This causes the I/O to be initialised again.
The fix is to clear REQ_CMD in blk_insert_request().
This may also be the cause of Patrick's Incorrect number of segments error.
James
[-- Attachment #2: tmp.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain , Size: 374 bytes --]
===== drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c 1.123 vs edited =====
--- 1.123/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c Fri Oct 18 12:41:37 2002
+++ edited/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c Fri Oct 25 18:48:12 2002
@@ -1374,6 +1374,7 @@
* must not attempt merges on this) and that it acts as a soft
* barrier
*/
+ rq->flags &= ~REQ_CMD;
rq->flags |= REQ_SPECIAL | REQ_BARRIER;
rq->special = data;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-26 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-25 1:39 possible use-after-free in 2.5.44 scsi changes Andrew Morton
2002-10-25 4:06 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-25 4:40 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-25 14:21 ` James Bottomley
2002-10-25 4:07 ` Patrick Mansfield
2002-10-25 14:16 ` James Bottomley
2002-10-25 18:34 ` James Bottomley
2002-10-25 18:49 ` Mike Anderson
2002-10-25 19:08 ` Patrick Mansfield
2002-10-25 19:41 ` Mike Anderson
2002-10-25 19:47 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-25 22:14 ` James Bottomley
2002-10-25 22:18 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-25 22:23 ` Badari Pulavarty
2002-10-26 0:13 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2002-10-26 0:18 ` Mike Anderson
2002-10-26 9:29 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-27 0:50 ` James Bottomley
2002-10-27 21:20 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-27 21:37 ` James Bottomley
2002-10-27 21:54 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-30 17:39 ` Badari Pulavarty
2002-10-30 18:16 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-30 19:31 ` Badari Pulavarty
2002-10-30 21:36 ` merlin hughes
2002-10-30 22:19 ` Badari Pulavarty
2002-10-31 2:17 ` merlin
2002-10-31 13:18 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-31 14:41 ` merlin
2002-10-31 14:46 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-31 15:04 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-31 15:12 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-31 17:41 ` merlin
2002-10-30 20:35 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-30 22:03 ` Badari Pulavarty
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-31 17:57 Badari Pulavarty
2002-10-31 18:46 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200210260013.g9Q0DP105454@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).