From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: verbose argument to sd_synchronize_cache
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:28:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021027162811.A21987@infradead.org> (raw)
sd_synchronize_cache() is always called with verbose=1, so this argument
should go away. But do we really want to be that verbose here? IMHO
we should remove the argumet and the printks..
next reply other threads:[~2002-10-27 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-27 16:28 Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2002-10-27 16:35 ` verbose argument to sd_synchronize_cache James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021027162811.A21987@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox