From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi sysfs update (upper 2/3)
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 04:53:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021108045305.A22307@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021108022158.GD1292@beaverton.ibm.com>; from andmike@us.ibm.com on Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 06:21:58PM -0800
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 06:21:58PM -0800, Mike Anderson wrote:
> Is the disagreement the function name, bus name, or the concept of
> registering these drivers with sysfs?
Well, they're not really busses, and I hate misleading analogies :)
No, my real issues is that the scsi_devices should be attached to
a bus hanging of the HBA, as that's what they physically do, not of
some pseudo-bus for the higherlevel devices.
> Do you see a problem with "scsi_upper_driver_register" being added now?
I'd prefer if we'd let it stay as-is for now.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-08 4:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-07 7:36 [PATCH] scsi sysfs update (base 1/3) Mike Anderson
2002-11-07 7:39 ` [PATCH] scsi sysfs update (upper 2/3) Mike Anderson
2002-11-07 7:42 ` [PATCH] scsi sysfs update (scsi_debug 3/3) Mike Anderson
2002-11-07 23:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-07 16:33 ` Mike Anderson
2002-11-07 23:35 ` Douglas Gilbert
2002-11-08 2:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-07 23:29 ` [PATCH] scsi sysfs update (upper 2/3) Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-07 16:41 ` Mike Anderson
2002-11-08 1:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-08 2:21 ` Mike Anderson
2002-11-08 3:34 ` Douglas Gilbert
2002-11-08 4:13 ` Mike Anderson
2002-11-08 4:53 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2002-11-08 5:41 ` Mike Anderson
2002-11-07 23:28 ` [PATCH] scsi sysfs update (base 1/3) Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-07 17:01 ` Mike Anderson
2002-11-07 17:22 ` Patrick Mansfield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021108045305.A22307@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=andmike@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox