public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi sysfs cleanups
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:39:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021119183908.GA1120@beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021119164856.A11391@infradead.org>

Christoph Hellwig [hch@infradead.org] wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 07:30:08AM -0800, Mike Anderson wrote:
> > +static inline void scsi_class_data_set(struct device *dev,
> > +				       struct Scsi_Host *host)
> > +{
> > +	dev->class_data = (void *)host;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static inline struct Scsi_Host *scsi_class_data_get(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	return (struct Scsi_Host *) dev->class_data;
> > +};
> 
> These casts look rather pointless.
> 

These interfaces allow LLDD to use the probe / remove device model
driver interfaces without having to store a previously registered
scsi_host pointer away in there private data. On remove a LLD is passed
a struct device pointer and would need to determine the associated
scsi_host to call scsi_remove_host.

I was trying to ensure consistency and type checking of class_data used
by host of class type scsi-host.

In the device model the struct device contains three void pointers for
use by associated member. driver_data is a private data pointer for the
device driver. class_data is for use by the class in this case scsi-host
class.


> > -module_init(init_scsi);
> > +subsys_initcall(init_scsi);
> >  module_exit(exit_scsi);
> 
> 
> What's the exact reason for this change?
> 

This could be removed. Without this change the
scsi_subsystem defaults to device_initcall level the same as upper and
lower levels. The original Makefile ordering SCSI has works around
this same level issue.

> >  /*
> > - * driverfs support for determining driver types
> > + * sysfs support
> >   */
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_driverfs_bus_type);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_device_driver_register);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_device_driver_unregister);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_host_class_register);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_host_class_unregister);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(shost_devclass);
> 
> Why are these exported?
> 

The *device_driver* interfaces are possibly not needed any more as I
originally had them exported because they where being called directly by
the upper layers.  Now they are being called by the mid-layer which this
*.o is linked. In the future the upper layers could call these directly
as the operations in scsi_register_device are handled by the sysfs layer
if upper layers fully support the device model probe / remove / release.

The *host_class* are interfaces for the LLDD to call to register and
unregister as a scsi host class driver.

These interfaces are used in a scsi_debug patch I have beyond scsi_debug
1.65 that demonstrate the used of these interfaces.


> > +/**
> > + * scsi_host_class_register - register class scsi host
> > + * @dev:	class device to register
> > + * @shost:	scsi host associtated with class device
> > + *
> > + * Return value:
> > + **/
> > +int scsi_host_class_register(struct device *dev, struct Scsi_Host *shost)
> > +{
> > +	scsi_class_data_set(dev, shost);
> > +	scsi_host_dev_set(shost, dev);
> > +
> > +	scsi_add_host(shost);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * scsi_host_class_unregister - unregister class scsi host.
> > + * @dev:	class device to unregister
> > + **/
> > +void scsi_host_class_unregister(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct Scsi_Host *shost;
> > +
> > +	shost = scsi_class_data_get(dev);
> > +
> > +	scsi_remove_host(shost);
> > +
> > +	scsi_class_data_set(dev, NULL);
> > +
> > +}
> > diff -Nru a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> 
> What the point of these?  They don't seem to be used at all..
> 

See previous comment.

-andmike
--
Michael Anderson
andmike@us.ibm.com


  reply	other threads:[~2002-11-19 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-19 15:30 [PATCH] scsi sysfs cleanups Mike Anderson
2002-11-19 16:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-19 18:39   ` Mike Anderson [this message]
2002-11-19 23:16     ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-20  0:46       ` Mike Anderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021119183908.GA1120@beaverton.ibm.com \
    --to=andmike@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox