public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Warning: about not setting max_sectors
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 08:47:50 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200212101447.gBAElpJ01949@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> of "Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:23:48 GMT." <20021210132348.A31628@infradead.org>

hch@infradead.org said:
> I added this intentionally.  The default is set in scsi_register_host
> which is an obsolete interface.  This warning reminds driver writers
> to set the value explicitly, with scsi_add_host & friends they won't
> get a default anymore. 

I don't think that's the correct behaviour.  The parameter is labelled as 
optional (and clearly should be for drivers that have no hard transfer limit).

The blk_queue_max_sectors() clearly should be initialised with the device in 
mind.  We have this limit coming at us from two directions: the driver (if it 
imposes such a limit) and the device (e.g. a SCSI-1 device only does read 6 
and thus 256 is the maximum etc.)

we should probably take the lowest of the scsi-1 minimum and the HBA if it 
exists in scsi_initialize_queue and readjust it when we've decided on the 
capabilities of the device.

In any event, moving the zero check for shpnt->max_sectors to 
scsi_initialize_queue would fix the loss of scsi_add_host, wouldn't it?

James



  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-12-10 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-09 14:55 Warning: about not setting max_sectors James Bottomley
2002-12-10 13:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-10 14:13   ` GOTO Masanori
2002-12-10 14:47   ` James Bottomley [this message]
2002-12-11 10:57     ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-11 14:37       ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200212101447.gBAElpJ01949@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox