From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Warning: about not setting max_sectors
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 08:47:50 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200212101447.gBAElpJ01949@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> of "Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:23:48 GMT." <20021210132348.A31628@infradead.org>
hch@infradead.org said:
> I added this intentionally. The default is set in scsi_register_host
> which is an obsolete interface. This warning reminds driver writers
> to set the value explicitly, with scsi_add_host & friends they won't
> get a default anymore.
I don't think that's the correct behaviour. The parameter is labelled as
optional (and clearly should be for drivers that have no hard transfer limit).
The blk_queue_max_sectors() clearly should be initialised with the device in
mind. We have this limit coming at us from two directions: the driver (if it
imposes such a limit) and the device (e.g. a SCSI-1 device only does read 6
and thus 256 is the maximum etc.)
we should probably take the lowest of the scsi-1 minimum and the HBA if it
exists in scsi_initialize_queue and readjust it when we've decided on the
capabilities of the device.
In any event, moving the zero check for shpnt->max_sectors to
scsi_initialize_queue would fix the loss of scsi_add_host, wouldn't it?
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-10 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-09 14:55 Warning: about not setting max_sectors James Bottomley
2002-12-10 13:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-10 14:13 ` GOTO Masanori
2002-12-10 14:47 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2002-12-11 10:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-11 14:37 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200212101447.gBAElpJ01949@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox