From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>,
dougg@torque.net, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.51 SCSI_IOCTL_GET_IDLUN + _GET_BUS_NUMBER
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 21:40:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021212204026.GB11892@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021212203903.A8484@infradead.org>
On Thu, Dec 12 2002, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 06:42:41PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Hmm, I _may_ be wrong but I think the main reason for GET_IDLUN and
> > GET_BUS_NUMBER in the generic block layer is to stop them from failing
> > in libscg and thus fooling it into believing we are scsi. You would need
> > to check libscg/scsi-linux-sg.c to be sure.
> >
> > For one thing, we need to maintain the behaviour we have now of _not_
> > failing them for ata devices. If you want to pass them down to SCSI as
> > well and get the right id/lun and bus, fine, but don't break the ata
> > one.
>
> I disagree. USerspace needs changes to support SG_IO on block device anyway
> so we should do it properly. There is no harm in changing interface during
How do you figure? Some of them probably, but most should just work
(provided they use SG_IO ioctl, of course).
> 2.5. IMHO most of the silly sg ioctl stubs in drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c
> should just die.
Feel free, I don't have time to do it right now.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-12 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-12 7:44 [PATCH] 2.5.51 SCSI_IOCTL_GET_IDLUN + _GET_BUS_NUMBER Douglas Gilbert
2002-12-12 14:27 ` James Bottomley
2002-12-12 17:42 ` Jens Axboe
2002-12-12 20:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-12 20:40 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2002-12-12 22:40 ` Douglas Gilbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021212204026.GB11892@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox