From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Willem Riede Subject: Re: buggy scsi_register behaviour in 2.5.51 Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:46:48 -0500 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20021220144648.GW7990@linnie.riede.org> References: <3DFE998E.1080103@interlog.com> <20021217114730.GE7990@linnie.riede.org> <3E006692.7020503@torque.net> Reply-To: wrlk@riede.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E006692.7020503@torque.net>; from dougg@torque.net on Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 07:14:10 -0500 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: dougg@torque.net Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 2002.12.18 07:14 Douglas Gilbert wrote: > > These are documented in Documentation/scsi/scsi_mid_low_api.txt . > If you find mistakes or the explanation is not clear then > complain to me. Your doc doesn't define the second parameter to scsi_add_host. Can you explain what the purpose is of the struct device *dev and how I'm supposed to pull one out of my hat in __init? I notice that the old style registration doesn't bother with shost->host_gendev. Thanks, Willem Riede.