From: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>,
luben@splentec.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: scsi command slab allocation under memory pressure
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 18:46:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030131184626.A22325@beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030131124412.086f2d1c.akpm@digeo.com>; from akpm@digeo.com on Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 12:44:12PM -0800
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 12:44:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 01:57, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Please do not reinvent the mm/mempool.c functionality.
> > >
> > > 'twould be better to just use it ;)
> >
> > Unfortunately, in this instance, mempool is a slight overkill. The
> > problem is that we need to guarantee that a command (or set of commands)
> > be available to a given device regardless of what's going on in the rest
> > of the system. Thus we might need a mempool for each active device,
> > rather than a mempool for all devices and a mechanism for giving fine
> > grained control to the pool depth per device.
>
> A lot depends on the context of the allocation. Can the caller sleep?
No (generally) - we are in our request function, and are called via soft
irq and from anywhere that blk_run_queues is called. Calls outside of the
request function can sleep (but they are not used for regular IO).
> Is the caller using GFP_ATOMIC/__GFP_HIGH?
Yes normally GFP_ATOMIC
> (What file-n-line should I be looking at, anyway?)
If you have bk, bk://linux-scsi.bkbits.net/scsi-combined-2.5, file is
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c - the calls to scsi_getset_command. That tree also
has other scsi changes, as well as changes related to the new allocation
scheme.
In 2.5.59 this was a call to scsi_allocate_device. The current 2.5
allocation alogrithm used by scsi_allocate_device is poor. In the new
code, scsi_allocate_device is replaced by a call to scsi_getset_command.
scsi_getset_command effectively calls kmem_cache_alloc(some_cache,
flags).
My complaint that started the thread is that (generally) we don't have
fairness across devices (scsi_device) on kmem_cache_alloc failure - a
failure can put us in a timeout/poll like mode, but anyone with an IO
already in flight can allocate (from kmem_cache_alloc or a single
scsi_cmnd saved per host adapter) and issue another IO before the device
that had a kmem_cache_alloc failure.
So, a swap disk could potentially be starved from issuing IO during low
memory conditions.
But, there is the extra scsi_cmnd per host adapter (not per device), and
it is always refilled (if empty) when a scsi_cmnd completes for that
adapter, this combined with filling of the cache via continued IO use
might prevent most (and hopefully all) such failures.
-- Patrick Mansfield
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-01 2:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-29 18:47 scsi command slab allocation under memory pressure Patrick Mansfield
2003-01-29 19:40 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-01-29 20:11 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-01-29 22:26 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-01-31 6:57 ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-31 13:46 ` James Bottomley
2003-01-31 20:44 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-01 2:46 ` Patrick Mansfield [this message]
2003-02-03 22:55 ` Doug Ledford
2003-02-03 22:59 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-03 23:05 ` James Bottomley
2003-02-03 23:19 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-04 18:04 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-04 6:15 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-01-29 22:53 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030131184626.A22325@beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=patmans@us.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luben@splentec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox