From: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Cc: SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add back single_lun support
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 17:16:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030205171640.A7065@beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1044486842.1773.89.camel@mulgrave>; from James.Bottomley@steeleye.com on Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 05:14:00PM -0600
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 05:14:00PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> I don't see device_active getting set anywhere.
>
> shouldn't we just dump device_active in favour of a non-zero check of
> device_busy (it's all done under the queue lock, anyway).
>
> James
OK - once more.
This patch against the current scsi-misc-2.5 adds back the check for the
single_lun case and removes the unused device_active field.
I compiled and booted with this applied but don't have any devices (i.e.
CD ROM changer) for testing.
--- 1.58/drivers/scsi/scsi.h Tue Feb 4 11:14:16 2003
+++ edited/drivers/scsi/scsi.h Wed Feb 5 17:36:00 2003
@@ -570,7 +570,6 @@
device is busy */
struct Scsi_Host *host;
request_queue_t *request_queue;
- atomic_t device_active; /* commands checked out for device */
volatile unsigned short device_busy; /* commands actually active on low-level */
struct list_head free_cmnds; /* list of available Scsi_Cmnd structs */
struct list_head busy_cmnds; /* list of Scsi_Cmnd structs in use */
===== drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 1.66 vs edited =====
--- 1.66/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c Wed Feb 5 08:33:15 2003
+++ edited/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c Wed Feb 5 17:44:10 2003
@@ -787,6 +787,22 @@
return ret;
}
+/*
+ * The target associated with myself can only handle one active command at
+ * a time. Scan through all of the luns on the same target as myself,
+ * return 1 if any are active.
+ */
+static int check_all_luns(struct scsi_device *myself)
+{
+ struct scsi_device *sdev;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(sdev, &myself->same_target_siblings,
+ same_target_siblings)
+ if (sdev->device_busy)
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
int scsi_prep_fn(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req)
{
struct Scsi_Device_Template *STpnt;
@@ -948,6 +964,9 @@
req = elv_next_request(q);
if (SDpnt->device_busy >= SDpnt->queue_depth)
+ break;
+
+ if (SDpnt->single_lun && check_all_luns(SDpnt))
break;
if(SHpnt->host_busy == 0 && SHpnt->host_blocked) {
-- Patrick Mansfield
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-06 1:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-05 22:51 [PATCH] add back single_lun support Patrick Mansfield
2003-02-05 23:14 ` James Bottomley
2003-02-06 1:16 ` Patrick Mansfield [this message]
2003-02-06 14:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030205171640.A7065@beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=patmans@us.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox