public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Cc: Steven Dake <sdake@mvista.com>,
	SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: why store the search type in the ieee name field?
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 08:20:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030211082039.A27630@beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1044918776.1776.257.camel@mulgrave>; from James.Bottomley@steeleye.com on Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 05:12:54PM -0600

On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 05:12:54PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 16:45, Steven Dake wrote:
> > Folks,
> > 
> > I was wondering the reasoning behind the code
> > 
> > scsi_scan:734
> >         /*
> >          * All OK - store ID
> >          */
> >       name[0] = hex_str[id_search->id_type];
> > 
> > This corrupts a perfectly good IEEE unique identifier (WWN for FC 
> > drives).  Is there some usage for this in user space?
> 
> Erm, it's appending the type to the beginning of the name string
> (although it does seem to be relying on the sysfs name field being zero
> filled).  I don't see any corruption since the inquiry fields and unique
> name name follows this byte.

It should fill in the rest of the 'name' and append a '\0', or return a
failure.

> You get the identifier it found from the sysfs name file for the
> device.  The first byte tells you what type of unique name you're
> dealing with.
> 
> James

And the identifiers are not unique across different identifier types, so
it has to store the id_type in order to have unique identifiers (at least
for scsi) across all types: for example, a vendor specific id could be the
same as a NAA (IEEE) id.

-- Patrick Mansfield

  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-11 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-10 22:45 why store the search type in the ieee name field? Steven Dake
2003-02-10 23:12 ` James Bottomley
2003-02-11 16:20   ` Patrick Mansfield [this message]
2003-02-11 16:43     ` James Bottomley
2003-02-11 16:46       ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-02-11 17:38       ` Steven Dake

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030211082039.A27630@beaverton.ibm.com \
    --to=patmans@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdake@mvista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox