From: Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>
To: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH / RFC] scsi_error handler update. (1/4)
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:44:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030211184455.GA1114@beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030211100006.A28010@beaverton.ibm.com>
Patrick Mansfield [patmans@us.ibm.com] wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 12:13:51AM -0800, Mike Anderson wrote:
> > This patch series is against scsi-misc-2.5.
> >
>
> > +#define SCSI_EH_CANCEL_CMD 0x0001 /* Cancel this cmd */
> > +#define SCSI_EH_REC_TIMEOUT 0x0002 /* EH retry timed out */
>
> SCSI_EH_REC_TIMEOUT isn't used.
>
SCSI_EH_REC_TIMEOUT is used in scsi_eh_times_out to indicate that a
scsi_eh_cmd timed-out. While we are not retrying failed commands in the
eh handler we are sending TURs which could timeout.
> Can we add a SCSI_EH_CMD, set for any command sent down for use in error
> handling, and for users (well, at least one user) of the obosolete
> eh_state?
>
We need a solution, but I was trying to keep these flags for eh use
only. Since there is some broken drivers now, maybe the easiest solution
is to provide a flag.
> Two drivers (u14-34f.c, eata.c) use eh_state as a redundant bug check
> during abort, its use there could be deleted.
>
Yes, maybe this check should be deleted.
Another option would be to use this check.
if (scmd->serial_number != scmd->serial_number_at_timeout) {
return (FAILED);
}
> One driver (drivers/fc4/fc.c, might not even work) uses eh_state to track
> the state of an internal scsi_cmnd - it needs two states, or it could
> be changed to track the scsi_cmnd state separately.
>
Short term might be easier to add the flag, but this driver could
allocate mem for host_scribble and use this.
> One driver (dpt_i2o.c) uses eh_state to figure out if it has a command
> sent via error handler, if not, it resets the timeout to a fixed value of
> 300 seconds (TMOUT_SCSI). It could use a SCSI_EH_CMD state to match its
> previous intended behaviour.
>
I do not have a good answer here right now.
-andmike
--
Michael Anderson
andmike@us.ibm.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-11 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-11 8:13 [PATCH / RFC] scsi_error handler update. (1/4) Mike Anderson
2003-02-11 8:15 ` [PATCH / RFC] scsi_error handler update. (2/4) Mike Anderson
2003-02-11 8:17 ` [PATCH / RFC] scsi_error handler update. (3/4) Mike Anderson
2003-02-11 8:19 ` [PATCH / RFC] scsi_error handler update. (4/4) Mike Anderson
2003-02-11 22:38 ` [PATCH / RFC] scsi_error handler update. (3/4) James Bottomley
2003-02-12 7:16 ` Mike Anderson
2003-02-12 14:26 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-12 14:37 ` James Bottomley
2003-02-12 22:34 ` James Bottomley
2003-02-13 8:24 ` Mike Anderson
2003-02-11 16:49 ` [PATCH / RFC] scsi_error handler update. (1/4) Luben Tuikov
2003-02-11 17:22 ` Mike Anderson
2003-02-11 19:05 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-11 20:14 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-11 21:14 ` Mike Anderson
[not found] ` <3E495862.3050709@splentec.com>
2003-02-11 21:20 ` Mike Anderson
2003-02-11 21:22 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-11 22:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-02-12 20:10 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-12 20:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-02-12 21:23 ` Mike Anderson
2003-02-12 22:15 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-12 21:46 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-13 15:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-02-13 18:55 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-14 0:24 ` Doug Ledford
2003-02-14 16:38 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-02-14 16:58 ` Mike Anderson
2003-02-14 18:50 ` Doug Ledford
2003-02-14 19:35 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-14 21:20 ` James Bottomley
2003-02-17 17:20 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-17 17:58 ` James Bottomley
2003-02-17 18:29 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-18 5:37 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-02-18 19:46 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-18 22:16 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-02-18 23:35 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-17 20:17 ` Doug Ledford
2003-02-17 20:19 ` Matthew Jacob
2003-02-17 21:12 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-17 17:35 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-14 21:27 ` James Bottomley
2003-02-17 17:28 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-16 4:23 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-02-11 18:00 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-02-11 18:44 ` Mike Anderson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030211184455.GA1114@beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=andmike@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patmans@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox