From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Luben Tuikov <luben@splentec.com>
Cc: Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH / RFC] scsi_error handler update. (1/4)
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 22:41:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030211224119.A23149@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E49698D.3030402@splentec.com>; from luben@splentec.com on Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 04:22:21PM -0500
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 04:22:21PM -0500, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> :-) yes, I know -- I was just saying that I don't like this policy
> that much.
>
> It's an oxymoronic to grab a spin lock and say to someone, ok
> you can sleep, and then release the spin lock...
Agreed. One of the things we really need to do is to change the calling
conventions of the eh methods to not have the lock held on entry.
I just wonder how we can archive that best without silently breaking
drivers.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-11 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-11 8:13 [PATCH / RFC] scsi_error handler update. (1/4) Mike Anderson
2003-02-11 8:15 ` [PATCH / RFC] scsi_error handler update. (2/4) Mike Anderson
2003-02-11 8:17 ` [PATCH / RFC] scsi_error handler update. (3/4) Mike Anderson
2003-02-11 8:19 ` [PATCH / RFC] scsi_error handler update. (4/4) Mike Anderson
2003-02-11 22:38 ` [PATCH / RFC] scsi_error handler update. (3/4) James Bottomley
2003-02-12 7:16 ` Mike Anderson
2003-02-12 14:26 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-12 14:37 ` James Bottomley
2003-02-12 22:34 ` James Bottomley
2003-02-13 8:24 ` Mike Anderson
2003-02-11 16:49 ` [PATCH / RFC] scsi_error handler update. (1/4) Luben Tuikov
2003-02-11 17:22 ` Mike Anderson
2003-02-11 19:05 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-11 20:14 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-11 21:14 ` Mike Anderson
[not found] ` <3E495862.3050709@splentec.com>
2003-02-11 21:20 ` Mike Anderson
2003-02-11 21:22 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-11 22:41 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2003-02-12 20:10 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-12 20:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-02-12 21:23 ` Mike Anderson
2003-02-12 22:15 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-12 21:46 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-13 15:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-02-13 18:55 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-14 0:24 ` Doug Ledford
2003-02-14 16:38 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-02-14 16:58 ` Mike Anderson
2003-02-14 18:50 ` Doug Ledford
2003-02-14 19:35 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-14 21:20 ` James Bottomley
2003-02-17 17:20 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-17 17:58 ` James Bottomley
2003-02-17 18:29 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-18 5:37 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-02-18 19:46 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-18 22:16 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-02-18 23:35 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-17 20:17 ` Doug Ledford
2003-02-17 20:19 ` Matthew Jacob
2003-02-17 21:12 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-17 17:35 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-14 21:27 ` James Bottomley
2003-02-17 17:28 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-16 4:23 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-02-11 18:00 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-02-11 18:44 ` Mike Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030211224119.A23149@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=andmike@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luben@splentec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox