Re: Move scsi.h, hosts.h to include/linux/scsi ?

[Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>]

On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:58:21PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > In general just combining all the stuff in a single scsi.h file
> > (the other alternative)  looks ugly to me.
> 
> Why?  If you think the current hosts.h make sense please explain
> me the rules on why stuff is in hosts.h instead of scsi.h..

It was just my first hand impressions that hosts.c had something to do
upper.h.
I have not looked into scsi before - and I'm not planning to that
except on a janitorial level. In other words I can do simple stuff
that moves definitions around, but I do not claim I understand the
SCSI subsystem. And I do not plan to invest the time needed to
understand it.
Hope that clarifies.

As I wrote in the previous mail, I'm not going to do any split-up as
you suggested. Simply because it would take much more time
understanding the SCSI subsystem than actually doing the split-up.

My only incentive is to avoid those ugly includes that requires an
extra option to gcc in my current kbuild patch for separate objdir.

	Sam