From: Willem Riede <wrlk@riede.org>
To: Andreas Steinmetz <ast@domdv.de>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.20: possibly wrong handling of removeable scsi disks
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 08:20:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030223132009.GA2155@linnie.riede.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E58BBC3.7020507@domdv.de>; from ast@domdv.de on Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 07:17:07 -0500
On 2003.02.23 07:17 Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
> if( the_result != 0
> && ((driver_byte(the_result) & DRIVER_SENSE) != 0)
> ===> && SRpnt->sr_sense_buffer[2] == UNIT_ATTENTION
> && SRpnt->sr_sense_buffer[12] == 0x3A ) {
> rscsi_disks[i].capacity = 0x1fffff;
> sector_size = 512;
> rscsi_disks[i].device->changed = 1;
> rscsi_disks[i].ready = 0;
> ...
>
> Now look at the marked (===>) lines above. I dont believe the test for
> UNIT_ATTENTION is correct. As far as I could find out the sense
> information from TEST_UNIT_READY should be either NO_SENSE,
> ILLEGAL_REQUEST or NOT_READY. As there is a check for 'medium not
> present' (0x3A) the test should be for NOT_READY instead of
> UNIT_ATTENTION. ger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
You are right about this one. It should be NOT_READY, value 0x02.
As a matter of fact, ASQ 0x3A is unique, so you could just delete the
test of sr_sense_buffer[2] and it would work as expected.
Success, Willem Riede.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-23 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-23 12:17 2.4.20: possibly wrong handling of removeable scsi disks Andreas Steinmetz
2003-02-23 13:20 ` Willem Riede [this message]
2003-02-23 13:41 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2003-02-23 16:14 ` Scott Merritt
2003-02-24 23:10 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-02-24 23:46 ` Scott Merritt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030223132009.GA2155@linnie.riede.org \
--to=wrlk@riede.org \
--cc=ast@domdv.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox