public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem Riede <wrlk@riede.org>
To: Andreas Steinmetz <ast@domdv.de>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.20: possibly wrong handling of removeable scsi disks
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 08:20:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030223132009.GA2155@linnie.riede.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E58BBC3.7020507@domdv.de>; from ast@domdv.de on Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 07:17:07 -0500

On 2003.02.23 07:17 Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
>              if( the_result != 0
>                  && ((driver_byte(the_result) & DRIVER_SENSE) != 0)
> ===>            && SRpnt->sr_sense_buffer[2] == UNIT_ATTENTION
>                  && SRpnt->sr_sense_buffer[12] == 0x3A ) {
>                      rscsi_disks[i].capacity = 0x1fffff;
>                      sector_size = 512;
>                      rscsi_disks[i].device->changed = 1;
>                      rscsi_disks[i].ready = 0;
>     ...
> 
> Now look at the marked (===>) lines above. I dont believe the test for 
> UNIT_ATTENTION is correct. As far as I could find out the sense 
> information from TEST_UNIT_READY should be either NO_SENSE, 
> ILLEGAL_REQUEST or NOT_READY. As there is a check for 'medium not 
> present' (0x3A) the test should be for NOT_READY instead of 
> UNIT_ATTENTION. ger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

You are right about this one. It should be NOT_READY, value 0x02.
As a matter of fact, ASQ 0x3A is unique, so you could just delete the
test of sr_sense_buffer[2] and it would work as expected.

Success, Willem Riede.

  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-23 13:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-23 12:17 2.4.20: possibly wrong handling of removeable scsi disks Andreas Steinmetz
2003-02-23 13:20 ` Willem Riede [this message]
2003-02-23 13:41   ` Andreas Steinmetz
2003-02-23 16:14     ` Scott Merritt
2003-02-24 23:10 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-02-24 23:46   ` Scott Merritt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030223132009.GA2155@linnie.riede.org \
    --to=wrlk@riede.org \
    --cc=ast@domdv.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox